r, * » j« 1< t 2 r ?/. r •/ * <"C< ^ f f c f r < ^ -r « f f y r , K 4 CCCM (/;k^(C <« 4 ^ '*' * ^ (, h * M C tf r r>f /, r r/,r « / 1 0* ,T( (c( (.ft r c ^l < f> r ■ f err ^ * * W (( (. ^ ( * r (i< 'MC «>< (r * ' ( 'V ( .-v t < (/ Co A Characidae Gill, Mem. Nat. acad. sci., 1893, 6, p. 131. Proc. U. S. N. M., 1895, 18, p. 206. = Characinidae Boulenger, Poissons bassin Congo, 1901, p. 132. Cambridge natural history. Fishes 1904, p. 575. Cat. freshwater fishes Africa, 1909, 1, p. 174. = Characidae Eigenmann, Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1909, 3, p. 252; 1910, p. 420. = Characiformes Regan, Ann. mag. nat. hist., 1911, ser. 8, 8, p. 15. > Characidae Regan, hoc. cit. < Erythroiiles Valenciennes, Hist. nat. poissons, 1S46, 19, p. 480. = Erythrinidae Richardson, Encycl. Brit., 1856, ed. 8, 12, p. 250. > Erythrinoidei Bleeker, Enum. sp. piscium Archipel. Indico, 1859, p. 31. > Erythrinidae Gill, Ann. Lye. nat. hist. N. Y., 1858, 6, p. 410. Mem. Nat. acad. sci., 1893, 6, p. 131. Proc. U. S. N. M., 1895, 18, p. 206. > Erythrinidae Cope, Proc. Amer. assoc. adv. sci., 1872, p. 333. > Erylhrini Fitzinger, Sitzungsb. Akad. wiss. Wien, 1873, 67, abth., p. 37. > Myletidae Adams, Man. nat. hist., 1854, p. 108. > Gastropelecidae Regan, Ann. mag. nat. hist. 1911, ser. 8, 8, p. 19. > Xiphostomatidae Regan, hoc. cit., p. 20. > Anastomidae Regan, hoc. cit., p. 20. > Hemiodontidae Regan, hoc. cit., p. 21. > Citharinidae Regan, hoc. cit., p. 21 . Zoological Position. The Characins are a family of Ostariophysi which, with the other families of this superorder, are now at their prime. They are the dominant family of fresh-water fishes in Tropical America and they play a prominent role in Africa. The Ostariophysi, which include most of the fresh-water fishes of the world, are distinguished from all other fishes by the peculiar arrangment of a series of 18 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. ossicles for placing the air-bladder in communication with the auditory appa- ratus. The first four vertebrae are modified. The first vertebra lacks the superior arch which is replaced by the "claustrum" and "scaphium" of the Weberian apparatus; the principal ossicle of the series, the "tripus," is associated with the third vertebra consisting of the rib and parapophysis of the third vertebra. The " inter calarium," representing the neural arch of the second vertebra, is imbedded in the ligament extending from the tripus to the scaphium. Very frequently the air-bladder comes in close contact with the skin, forming a pseudotympanum above the pectorals. In the Characins the area is not unfrequently marked by a humeral spot, a gathering of pigment cells from contiguous areas. This spot may become shifted away from the tympanum. The air-bladder is usually connected with the intestine by a duct. The pectoral girdle is suspended from the skull by a long posttemporal; the mesocoracoid is present and the ventral fins are abdominal. The orders and suborders of the Ostariophysi may be separated by the following key: — a. Maxillary bone usually a toothless vestige carrying a barbel; no subopercle or sympleetic; no scales; supraoccipital and parietals coossified; mouth usually with teeth; ribs attached to trans- verse apophyses; skin naked or covered with bony plates. Usually an adipose dorsal. Nematognathi or Siluroidea. aa. Maxillary usually well developed, not forming the base of a barbel, but sometimes one or more small barbels at or near its end; subopercle and syrnplectie present; parietals distinct from the supra- occipital; thoracic vertebrae without parapophyses; ribs mostly sessile; naked or with scales. Plectospondyli or Cyprinoidea. b. Lower pharyngeals falciform, parallel with the gill-arches; jaws toothless; brain-case produced between the orbits; basis cranii simple; two superior pharyngeals; mouth without teeth, more or less protractile; no adipose fin (Eventognathi or Cyprinipormes). 66. Lower pharyngeals not falciform; three basal branchihyals; basis cranii double, sometimes with myodome; one to four superior pharyngeals; mouth usually not protractile, usually with teeth. f. Anus submedian; body variously shaped, never eel-shaped; dorsal and usually an adipose fin present; ventrals abdominal (Heterogxathi or Characiformes). cc. Anus at throat; body eel-shaped; dorsal absent, or reduced; ventrals absent.. . (Gymxoxoti). The Eventognathi do not enter the Neotropical realm. The Gymnonoti are confined to it, the Heterognathi, as stated, occur in Africa and South America. The Nematognathi have an all but universal distribution. Sagemehl (Morphologische jahrbuch, 1884, 10) pointed out the similarity of the Erythrinoids to Amia, and suggested the derivation of the family from the Holostei and more particularly from the Cycloganoidea. Boulenger (Poisson bassin Congo, 1901) considers the Characidae, more particularly the Erythrins, THE CHARACIDAE. 19 as the primitive Ostariophysi from which the Cyprinidae (Gymnonoti) and Nematognathi have been derived. These families seem to him to represent three states in the evolution of Teleosteans, the Cyprinidae and Siluridae being derived apparently from a common ancestor, very near the Characins, these latter ranging themselves to the holostean Ganoids through the Erythrins. Later Boulenger (Cambridge natural history. Fishes, 1904, p. 575) refers to them as "a very generalized type, although perhaps not directly derived from the bony Ganoids." The relationship recognized by him he represented as follows : Eventognathi Nematognathi Gymnonoti Heterognathi Rowntree (Trans. Linn. soc. Lond., 1903, ser. 2, 9, p. 78) concludes his extensive account of the visceral anatomy of Characins with the following words: — "With the possible exception of the indications of a cellular air-bladder, there appears to be nothing in the visceral anatomy of the Characinidae which strengthens the deductions made from the skull as to the Amioid affinities of the group. In opposition to such deductions are especially the cystoarian ovaries, the asymmetric ductus pneumaticus, the presence of pyloric appendages and the absence of all trace of a valvular conus and of an intestinal spiral valve." In view of the observations of every naturalist who has studied the Char- acins, notably Boulenger with the African species, and the author with the American forms, it is doubtful whether the similarity of the Erythrins with the Ganoids is anything more than one of the innumerable radial adaptations this plastic family has undergone. Radial Adaptation. Boulenger's remarks (Poissons bassin Congo, 1901, p. 132-135) concerning the African representatives may be translated as follows: — This is a very natural family whose internal organization shows a great affinity with the Cyprinidae but whose exterior appearance, due to adaptation to various modes of life, varies so much that the beginner in African ichthyology will mistake its various representa- tives as near the Salmonids, pikes, and roaches of Europe. It is also impossible to state in a 20 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. few words the marks distinguishing the members of this family from such other fishes with abdominal ventrals and soft rayed fins as the Siluridae, Mormyridae, and Nototeridae. The presence of an adipose dorsal behind the rayed dorsal, although absent in some non-African genera, is a common character of the African fauna which it shares only with the Siluridae, which differ by their naked skin [one of the South American Characins is naked]. The Salmonids which also possess this adipose fin belong, on account of their general structure, to the same great group as the Clupeids which lack it and are strangers to Africa south of the Atlas. One of the prime characters used in separating the Characinidae from its nearest related families is the structure of the mouth described as bordered by the premaxillaries in the middle and the maxillaries on the sides, while in the Cyprinidae and Siluridae the upper jaw is said to be bordered by the premaxillaries only. While this definition is valid for the most of the representatives of this family we must not forget, as Segemehl has impressed on us, that there are numerous exceptions which destroy the diagnostic value of this character. Thus the maxillary is so reduced in Serrasalmo, Citharinus, Eugnatichthys, Phago, being confined to the angle of the mouth that it is proper to question if this bone really forms part of the border of the mouth and very recently I have been able to determine that it is absolutely excluded in Ichthyoborus and Neoborus. On the other hand, among Siluridae (Nematognathi), whose premaxillaries are greatly reduced the mouth is bordered laterally by the maxillaries. Chaca has a large maxillary bordering the mouth, Diplomystes and Eutropichthys have a toothed maxillary, and among the Cyprinidae Catostomus shows us the premaxillary and maxillary together forming the mouth border. There are otherwise very great differences in the structure of the jaws among the fishes which are justly united in one family, the Chara- cinidae. Thus the premaxillary, while never protractile, [I have since found Bivibranchia, a new genus, with protractile premaxillaries] is often vertically mobile (like the lower jaw), Ichthyoborinae; the maxillaries are either ankylosed to the premaxillaries or mobile on them, and in the majority of genera they do not directly articulate with the cranium, the only African exception being Sarcodaces. The character given by other authors to distinguish the Characins from the Cyprinids, i. e. the non prolongation of the brain capsule between the orbits in the former is not more constant, for in Citharinus and Xenocharax, for example, it extends forward to the nasal region. There are all degrees between this and the more usual one from which the objection- able definition is drawn. The orbitosphenoid, undivided and often membranaceous, forms a large interorbital septum in front of the cerebral cavity or below its anterior part. We have here an important character although it may not be constant, a specialization in this reduc- tion of the anterior part of the basis cranii and in its replacement by a thin interorbital parti- tion. The presence of teeth in the jaws does not distinguish the Characins from the Cyprinids because both African and American genera lack them. The teeth vary enormously in struc- ture and furnish valuable characters to distinguish numerous genera of this family. They are found on the premaxillary, the lower jaw, sometimes they are also present on the maxil- laries. They are but rarely found on the palate and none of the African genera offer any examples. The branchiostegal rays number only 3 to 5. There are four branchial arches. Pseudo- branchia are lacking or are rudimentary and glandular. The coracoid often forms a ventral ridge. The scapulars, epicoracoid, and postclavicle are distinct. The ventral rays number 10 to 13. The first pectoral, the dorsal, and anal rays are but rarely ossified and never form a formidable spine as in the Siluridae. Vertebrae in the African species vary from 17-33 + 13-24 = 33-57. THE CHAR ACID AE. 21 The scales, large or small, are ciliated in certain genera — a character very rare among the Physostomes. As Valenciennes says of Distichodus, the free part of the scales is truly ctenoid, the rest cycloid. The head always lacks scales, a rare thing in fishes. The lateral line organ is represented on the opercle by a branch from the suborbital. The air-bladder is always divided into two parts by a constriction. The anterior part is much smaller than the posterior. In some, Alestes, the air-bladder may be prolonged along the right side of the hemapophyses and interneurals as far as the posterior end of the anal. There are generally 10-25 coeca on the stomach and this number may be raised to 35 or 40 (Hydrocyon, Citharinus). The intestine in the carnivorous genera is short and makes but one loop; on the other hand, it is excessively long and with many windings in the herbivorous types. In looking over this review of the characters of the family of Characins it is seen that there is none that taken alone and allowing for the exceptions, justifies its separation from the Cyprinids. We are forced to content ourselves with a combination of characters, any one of which taken by itself is insufficient. These words apply almost verbatim to the American members of the family. The American Characins range from the border of the United States to some distance south of Buenos Aires. They form about one third of the entire South American fresh-water fauna and have diverged in adaptation to diverse food, diverse habitat, and diverse enemies to fill nearly every niche open to fishes. The ends of the three lines of adaptation to different food give us mud- eating forms, with long intestinal tract and no teeth, 1 flesh-eaters with shear- like teeth that are able to cut their way out of nets, attack large fishes, horses, and bathers, and conical-toothed forms with sharp, needle-like teeth and com- paratively huge fangs. Greater diversity could scarcely be imagined, and one is led to suspect that some of the forms are over-adapted. In their divergence in form they have reached almost every conceivable shape, and have approached or paralleled many members of the diverse families of North American fresh- water fishes. Our shads and fresh-water herrings have their counterparts in Elopomorphus, Potamorhina, and Psectrogaster, our salmons are paralleled by Salminus and Catabasis, and our minnows by Astyanax and its relatives. It takes but a slight flight of the imagination to detect the striking similarity of Luciocharax to our gar pikes; our mullets are duplicated by Prochilodus; our top minnows are mimicked by Nannostomus. Bivibranchia, a recent dis- covery, shows a close similarity to Albula, and even our festive darters are duplicated by members Characidium of this most remarkable family. This plasticity of the family in both America and Africa, and the apparent if not real duplication of forms in the two continents, is the more remarkable 1 The toothless forms are not represented in Africa where members of the Cyprinidae replace them. 22 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. when we consider the very probable long separation of the African and Ameri- can sections of the family, and that the present forms in Africa and America have probably independently evolved in the two continents from a common rudiment. As von Ihering first pointed out for animals in general, and as I have more particularly shown for the fishes, there has probably been no inter- migration between the two continents since or previous to the early Tertiary. Before the Tertiary von Ihering has postulated an Archhelenic continent between Africa and South America from which the two continents probably derived the ancestors of the Characins among other elements of the present fauna. It is known that the Characins have inhabited South America since the early Tertiary at a time when the tropical part of the continents probably con- sisted of two islands, one occupying the Guianas, the other the plateau of eastern Brazil. From this small area and from the primitive group of Characins inhabiting it, the continent and family grew contemporaneously to their present proportions. They spread from these centers over the developing continent till they met unfavorable climatic conditions in the south, and high mountains or contestants in the north. They spread southward in decreasing numbers to and beyond the barren areas of Argentine to the edge of Patagonia, and they spread northward decreasing rapidly in numbers at Panama, only one of them reaching the United States, three southern Mexico, and three the Motagua River. In South America they have always flourished, their only competitors in the rivers of the growing continent being the indigenous fishes contemporaneously developing from similar small rudiments. They have never been hampered or affected by intrusive elements. Their territory has from the first been unap- proachable to foreign fresh-water fishes, and the marine species that have accli- mated themselves have not diverged to any extent from their marine relatives. The African section, on the other hand, came into competition with emi- grants from India, and, according to Boulenger, the affinity of the entire Afri- can fauna with Asia, "is much greater than with America which is emphasized by the fact that the genera in the two first named regions are identical, while America possesses genera very closely related but not identical with those of Africa." The American Characins have diverged, as stated before, in the most amaz- ing manner in almost all possible ways towards diverse forms assumed by fishes. Some are long and slender, some nearly as deep as long, some spindle-shaped, others compressed. It is, however, in the teeth and alimentary canal that we find the greatest diversity, as has already been pointed out, and as will be THE CHARACIDAE. 23 described in detail. The fact that different authors have associated different members of the Characidae with the herring, trout, cyprinids, and poecilids indicates in a measure their versatility. Literature. The earliest observations on Characins are recorded on some ancient monuments of Egypt. Heckel (Die fische Aegyptens chronologisch der zeitfolge ihrer ersten und spateren wissenschaftlichen kenntnissnahme nach geordnet, p. 213 of Abbildungen und beschreibungen der fische Syriens, 1843) identifies Dislichodus nilolicus and Citharinus geoffroyi from mural decorations of graves near the Pyramids. Boulenger (Fishes of the Nile, 1907, p. 156) finds that Citharinus citharus Geoffroy is represented on the mural paintings of the tombs at Giza and Sapara, at Deir el Gebrawi, and on the tomb of Ti at Sakkara. The American Characins were firs.t brought to the notice of naturalists by Marcgrav, who, in 1648 in his Historiae rerum naturalium Braziliae, 4, described the following : — Curimata, p. 156 = ProchUodus argenteus (Agassiz). Tareira do Rio, p. 157 = Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch). Piraya, p. 164 = Pygocentrus piraya (Cuvier). Maturaque, p. 169 = Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch). Piabucu, p. 170 = Piabucus dcntatus (Koelreuter). Piaba, p. 170 = An Anostomus (?) Ten years later, in 1658, Piso followed this account in his Historiae naturalis et medicae Indiae Occidentalis libri quinque, which is but a second edition of the former work, with figures and descriptions of the same species: — Piabucu, p. 66, Piaba, p. 67, Maturaque, p. 67, Tareira II do Rio, p. 68, Piranha, p. 69, Curimata, p. 70. The detailed history of the African section of the family will not be given here. 1 The number of known African species is far smaller than the number of American species which exceeds six hundred. In Seba's Locupletissimi verum naturalium thesauri accurata descriptis, 1 Boulenger (Fishes of the Nile, 1907, p. 117) indicates that the Salmo nilolicus Linn6, Syst. nat., ed. 12 is not the Salmo niloticus of Hasselquist. The date, 1757, of Hasselquist, however, being pre- Linnean, the name Salmo nilolicus must be applied to the species of LinnS ed. 10. The S. nilolicus of the Systema ed. 12, which is the same as that of ed. 10, is, according to Boulenger, identical with Mylelcs baremose Joannis, and the latter = Alestcs baremose of Boulenger, p. 117, should stand as Mylelcs nilo- licus. Further according to Boulenger, p. 141, the Salmo nilolicus of Hasselquist is Salmo aegyptiacus of Gmelin. The name Salmo nilolicus being a synonym of Mylelcs niloticus cannot be used for any other species and the oldest name after Hasselquist should be applied to his species. This oldest name is Salmo aegyptiacus and since this is a Distichodus the species should be Dislichodus aegyptiacus instc ad of Distichodus niloticus as given by Boulenger, p. 14 1 . 24 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. 1758, over the signature of Artedi, but according to Gill ' by another author, the name Tetragonoptrus, coined by Klein and originally intended for entirely dif- ferent fishes, was applied to the species now known as Tetragonopterus argenteus. In 1754 and 1756 Gronovius in his Museum ichthyologicum defined the following genera : — Charax, 1754, p. 19. Gasteropelecus, 1756, p. 7, pi. 7, fig. 5. Anostomus, 1756, p. 13, pi. 7, fig. 2. Erythrinius, 1756, p. 6, pi. 7, fig. 6. The two species referred by Gronovius to Charax were subsequently in- corporated in the genera Charax (gibbosus) and Astyanax (fimaculatus) . The Gasteropelecus is the Gasteropelecus sternicla of present authors. His Anos- tomus is Anostomus anostomus and Erythrinus is Erythrinus salmoneus. In 1777 Scopoli (Introductio ad historiam naturalem * * *) adopted these genera into the binomial system with Gronovius species as the types. Linne abandoned all of these genera and distributed the species known to him in the genera Clupea, Cyprinus, and Salmo. The species described or recognized by Linne in his tenth and twelfth editions and in Gmelin's the thir- teenth edition of the Systema Naturae are given in the following table modified from that of Gill (Proc. U. S. N. M., 18, p. 213) : ] [758 176C 1788 Page No. Page No. Page No. Salmo argenbvwus 2 2 511 12 1372 12 Piabucus dentatus gibbosus 311 19 513 20 1384 20 Charax gibbosus. notatus 513 21 1385 21 Astyanax fasciatus bimacvlatus 311 20 513 22 1385 22 Astyanax bimaculatus immaculatus 312 21 513 23 1385 23 (?) cyprinoides 514 25 1385 25 Curimatus cyprinoides niloticus 312 22 514 26 1386 26 Myletes n iloticus aegyptiacus 1386 49 Distichodus aegyptia- cus & rostratus pulverulcntus 312 23 514 27 1386 27 Astyanax ? rhombeus 514 28 1386 28 Serrasalmo rhombeus anostomus 312 24 514 29 1387 29 Anostomus anostomus 'Clupea sima 3 319 6 524 7 ? ? sternicla 319 7 524 3 1384 48 Gasteropelecus stern tela Cyprinus ccphalus part' • 322 7 527 7 1417 (i Erythrinus ccphalus dentex 325 531 26 1383 47 Myletes dentex & hare- 1 Proc. TJ. S. N. M., 1895, 18, p. 225-227. 2 The generic names are those used in the tenth edition. 3 Clupa sima is credited to Asia by Linn6. It is placed in the synonymy of slei -nick by ISloch, p. 418. I know nothing further about it. THE CHARACIDAE. 25 The total number of species known to Linne is thus seen to have been from eight to ten in 1758 and from twelve to fourteen in 1766, to which but a single species had been added at the time of the publication of the 13th edition in 1788. Linne" apparently knew none of the species described by Marcgrav except Marcgrav's piabucu which is Salmo argentinus Linne\ In 1794 Bloch in his Auslandische fische added a number of species without, however, recognizing any distinct Characinid genera. In Schneider's edition of Bloch's Systema ichthyologiae published in 1801 the following species were recognized: — Synodw malabricus Bloch, p. 397. (tafel 392 of Bloch). Synodvs erythrinus Bloch & Schneider, p. 397. Synodus tareira Bloch & Schneider, p. 398, pi. 79. Synod™ palustris Bloch & Schneider, p. 398. Salmo frideriei Bloch, p. 403. (tafel 378 of Bloch). Salmo fasciatus Bloch, p. 403. (tafel 379 of Bloch). Salmo argentinus Linne, p. 403. (tafel 382, fig. 1 of Bloch). Salmo rhombeus Linne, p. 404. (tafel 383 of Bloch). Salmo falcatus Bloch, p. 404. (tafel 385 of Bloch). Salmo odoe Bloch, p. 405. (tafel 386 of Bloch). Salmo pulverulcntm Linne, p. 406. Salmo dentex Linne, p. 407. Salmo edentulus Bloch, p. 412. (tafel 380 of Bloch). Salmo melanurus Bloch, p. 412. (tafel 381, fig. 2 of Bloch). Salmo unimacidatus Bloch, p. 412. (tafel 381, fig. 3 of Bloch). Salmo bimaculatus Linne, p. 413. (tafel 382, fig. 2 of Bloch). Salmo anastomus Linne, p. 414. Salmo niloticus Linne, p. 414. Salmo cyprinoides Linne, p. 414. Salmo curimata Bloch & Schneider, p. 417. Salmo aegyptius Gmelin, p. 418. {aegyptiacus of Gmelin). Salmo gasteropelecu3 Gmelin, p. 418. Salmo immaculatus Linne, p. 419. Salmo gibbosus Linne, p. 419. In 1802 Lacepede (Histoire naturelle des poissons) created for Salmo rhom- beus Linne" the genus Serrasalmo and adopted the Charax of Gronovius as Characinus for piabuca, dentex, gibbosus, notatus, bimaculatus, immaculatus, cyprinoides, niloticus, nefasch, pulverulentus, anostomus, friderici, fasciatus, melanurus, and odoe. The real advance in our knowledge of the relationships of the Characins did not begin until several years later when Cuvier (1817) published his Regne animal, and a series of articles in the Memoires Museum d'histoire naturelle. In the Regne animal (p. 174) he recognized Erythrinus which he placed in his Clupes and the following genera which were included in 26 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. the family of Salmones: — Characinus, Curimatus, Anostomus, Serrasalmo, Piabucus, Tetragonopterus, Myletes, Hydrocynus, Citharinus, and Gastero- pelecus. 1 In 1829, Memoires Museum d'histoire naturelle, 4, he further defined Chalceus and in 1819, 6, apparently substituted Hydrocyon for Hydrocynus. A great advance towards a knowledge of the South American Characinid fauna was made by Spix and Agassiz in the Selecta genera et species piscium Brasiliensis, 1829. They defined Prochilodus Agassiz (= Pacu Spix), Anodus Spix, Lepori- nus Spix, Schizodon Agassiz, Salminus Agassiz, Hiphorhynchus Agassiz ( = Acestrorhynchus Eigenmann), Rhaphiodon Agassiz (= Cynodon Spix), and Xiphostoma; they also described many new species. Up to this time and for several years later the Characins were distributed among the Salmonids and Clupeids and the peculiar parallelism between some of the genera of these families and the genera of the Characidae made such an association seem natural. In 1842 Johannes Miiller in his treatise on the air- bladder of fishes (Monatsb. Acad, wiss., Berlin, June 1842 and Arch. anat. u. phys., 1842, p. 307) described the genera Macrodon (= Hoplias) and Hemiodus and united all of the Characins in Ins new family Characinidae. In 1844 Miiller and Troschel published a synopsis of the known genera (Wiegmann's archiv, 1844, 1, p. 81) and defined the new genera Chilodus, Distichodus, Alestes, Brycon, Exodon, Epicyrtus, Hydrolycus, Pygocentrus, Pygopristis, Catoprion, and Myleus. They followed this in 1845 by the first monograph on the Characinidae, Die familie der Characinen (Horae Ichthyo- logicae, 1, 2). Here all of the then known genera, including the new genus Agoniates are described and the known species enumerated. This work by Miiller and Troschel was up to that time by far the most important as well as the most comprehensive work on the Characins. It is the first of three general accounts that have appeared. In it were recognized thirty-one genera and eighty-eight species. Of these twenty-seven genera and eighty species were American, the remainder African. Miiller and Troschel's work was closely followed by the second revision of the group. Cuvier and Valenciennes in the 19th (1846) and 22nd (1848) volumes of their Histoire naturelle des poissons described many species and the genera Lebiasina and Pyrrhulina, 19 and Parodon, Piabucina, Tometes, Mylesinus, Chalcinus and Cynopotamus, 22. A retrograde step was taken in rejecting the Characinidae and including the genera in the Salmonidae. 1 Gasteropelecus is attributed to Bloch. THE CHARACIDAE. 27 In 1854 Girard (Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 6, p. 199) described the genus Cheirodon, the first Characin reported from the Pacific slope of America. This genus was afterward found to be widely distributed on the eastern slope. In the same year Baird & Girard (Proc. Acad. nat. sci., Phil., 7, p. 27) described Astyanax argenlatus, the only species that reaches the United States and the first to be recorded of the overflow from South America northward. The notable work by Castelnau, (1855) Exped. Amerique Sud. Poissons, while containing many figures and description of species added nothing to our understanding of the relations of the various members of the family. In 1858 Gill published (Ann. Lye. nat. hist., N. Y., 6) a short paper on the fresh-water fishes of Trinidad. In it he recognized Erythinus and Macrodon as forming a distinct family and described a new subfamily, Stevardiinae. He also established the genera Poecilurichthys and Hemigrammus. In the following year (1859) appeared a very important contribution to the knowledge of the Characins, Zur familie der Characinen, by Kner. He defined the new genera Microdus, Rhytiodus, and Bryconops and described and figured a large number of new species from various parts of South America. Erythrinus and Macrodon are excluded from the Characidae on account of the absence of an adipose fin. The same author (1863) defined the genera Pseudochalceus, Chalcinopsis, and Saccodon, the latter in connection with Steindachner who has since contributed so much to the knowledge of tropical American fishes. In the same year Gunther defined the genus Crenuchus. In 1864 we have the culmination of an epoch in the history of the Characins. Before 1802, at least during the binomial period, naturalists concerned them- selves altogether with the description of new species. Beginning with Lacepede, in 1802, we have a series of descriptions of new genera by Cuvier, Spix, Agassiz, and Muller. To this period belongs the work of Cuvier and Valenciennes although it appeared later. In 1844 and 1845 we have the first attempts by Muller and Troschel of a philosophic review of the material that had been accumulated. All subsequent work was tinged by Muller and Troschel's Die familie der Characinen. In 1864 was published the second revision of the family. Cuvier and Valenciennes's work being an enumeration, or descriptive catalogue, rather than a revision, and Kner's works being confined to American species. Gunther, in the Catalogue of the fishes of the British Museum, 1864, 5, reunited the Erythrinidae with the Characinidae. He defined or used for the first time the generic names Caenotropus, Brachyalestes, Creatochanes, Hemibrycon, Scissor, Creagrutus, Anacyrtus, Roestes, Roeboides, Hystricodon, 28 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Sarcodaces, Oligosargus, and Ichthyborus. Giinther recognized in all forty- seven genera and two hundred and five species. Of these forty genera and one hundred and eighty-one species are American. Giinther groups the genera in a number of subfamilies whose characters are largely the presence or absence of an adipose fin, perfection or imperfection of dentition, the length of the dorsal fin, and the character of the gill-openings. The following synopsis will indicate his subfamilies and the characters on which they are based : — a. Adipose fin absent Erythrinina, 1 American. aa. Adipose fin present 6. Dentition imperfect c. Dorsal fin short Curimatina, American. cc. Dorsal fin rather long Cilharinina, African. 66. Dentition well developed d. Dorsal fin short e. Gill-openings narrow, the gill-membrane grown to the isthmus /. Elements of the jaws separate g. Nasal openings remote from each other Anostomatina, American. (gg. Nasal openings close together Nannocharacina, African). ee. Gill-openings wide, the gill-membrane not grown to the isthmus. h. Teeth compressed, notched, or denticulated. Telragonoplerina, American and African. hh. Teeth all conical Uydrocyonina, American and African. (jj. Both jaws very movable, their lateral halves being united into one piece. Phagonina, African). dd. Dorsal fin rather long i. Gill-openings of moderate width, the gill-membrane being attached to the isthmus. Distichodonlina, African. ii. Gill-openings wide, the gill-membrane not being attached to the isthmus. j. Belly rounded; jaws with conical teeth Ichthyborina, African. jj. Belly rounded; canine teeth none. . . .Crenuchina, American and African. jjj. Belly with a spinous serrature Serrasalmonia, American. Giinther immediately (1865) added the Phagonina and shortly afterwards (1867) the Nannocharacina from Africa, assigning the latter to a place between the Anostomatina and the Tetragonopterina. Both are included in parentheses in the foregoing synopsis. Giinther's work stimulated exploration and description to a great extent, and following the publication of his Catalogue we have contributions by Giinther himself between 1864 and 1900; by Gill 1864-1903; Reinhard 1866; Cope between 1870 and 1894; Lutken 1874-1890; Steindachner 1875 to the present; Boulenger from 1887 to the present; Eigenmann and Eigenmann from 1889 to the present; Garman 1890-1895; Perugia 1891-1897; von Ihering 1893 to 1 Including the Stevardiinae of Gill. THE CHARACIDAE. 29 the present; Berg 1895-1901; Lahille 1895 to the present; Ulrey 1895; Regan 1900 to the present; Meek 1885-1916; Fowler; Nichols; Hildebrand and Mrs. Marion Durbin Ellis. The discovery of the numerous species and genera since 1864 are too com- plicated for detailed enumeration. Reinhard and Liitken considered chiefly the species inhabiting the basin of the Rio das Velhas a tributary of the Rio San Francisco, Central America and Trinidad. Cope, 1870-1878, dealt largely with species of the Upper Amazons, and later with species from Rio Grande do Sul. Steindachner has published descriptions of numerous new species, col- lected by Agassiz and his associates during the Thayer Expedition and in part by himself and correspondents. Boulenger has reported on numerous collec- tions received by the British Museum from different parts of South America. Eigenmann and Eigenmann have reviewed the Erythrininae and Curimatinae; Carman has published critical revisions of a few genera; Ulrey has reviewed parts of the Tetragonopterinae. Perugia reported on various collections re- ceived by the Museum of Genoa. Regan is describing species from the collec- tions of the British Museum and Holmberg, von Ihering, Senior and Junior, Berg, Lahille, Ribeiro, and Goeldi were the first of a group of resident naturalists who have made important observations on their own faunae, chiefly eastern Brazil and Argentina. While many of the authors suggest modifications in parts of the system proposed by Gunther, only Eigenmann and Regan con- cerned themselves with the broader questions of the classification of the Characins. In 1884 Sagemehl demonstrated the close relationship of the catfishes, electric eels (Gymnotidae), Cyprinidae, and Characidae, all of which he grouped, on account of the common possession of the complicated Weberian apparatus, in the superorder Ostariophysi. Further studies on the anatomy of the Characins were published in 1903 by Rowntree. Gill, in 1893, (Families and subfamilies of fishes) admitted the two families of Heterognaths, Characinidae, and Erythrinidae. He had defined these in 1858 and redefined them in 1895 (Proc. U. S. N. M., 18) when he intimated the existence of a third family, the Citharinidae. Together with Muller and Troschel and Kner he considers that the Characinidae, even after the exclusion of the Erythrinidae, "constitute a heterogenous group." Gill recognizes the sub- families Erythrininae, Pyrrhulininae, Lebiasininae, Tetragonopterinae, Ser- rasalmoninae, Hydrocyoninae, Myletinae, Distichodontinae, Anostominae, Curimatinae, and Citharininae. 30 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. In a recent paper (Cambridge natural history. Fishes, 1904) Boulenger while recognizing that "The classification of the family is still in an unsatis- factory state "divides them into the following groups (hardly deserving the rank of subfamilies) " : — A. Erythrininae American. B. Hydrocyoninae African and American. C. Serrasalmoninae American D. Ichthyoborinae African. E. Xiphostominae American. F. Anostominae American. G. Hcmiodontinae American. H. Distichodontinae African. I. Citharininae African and American. Regan (Ann. mag. nat. hist., 1911, ser. 8, 8) comes to quite different con- clusions in regard to the "groups" of Boulenger. He divides his Characiformes, i. e. the Heterognathi of authors, into six families (a) the Characidae which equals the Erythrininae, Hydrocyoninae, and Serrasalmoninae of Boulenger, (b) the Xiphostomatidae = Xiphostominae of Boulenger, (c) the Anostomidae = Anostominae of Boulenger plus Curimatus and Prochilodus, (d) the Hemiodon- tidae = Hemiodontinae of Boulenger, (e) the Citharinidae = Ichthyoborinae, Distichodontinae, and Citharininae exclusive of Curimatus and Prochilodus of Boulenger, and (f) the Gastropelecidae proposed for the flying Chara- cins included in the Hydrocyoninae by Boulenger. Regan's paper offers some criticism of my classification published in the Reports of the Princeton University Expeditions to Patagonia, 1909, 3, p. 253- 256. In part I heartily agree with Regan, and long ago came to some of the conclusions reached by him. There are, however, many points in Regan's paper in which I think his conclusions are at variance with the facts. I reserve my criticism of Regan's strictures and a discussion of the general classification of the Characins until my study of all the subfamilies is completed. The keys of the subfamilies given in the Patagonian reports do not agree entirely with my present views, (cf. Rept. Princeton univ. exped. to Patagonia, 1909, 3, p. 253-256). Geographical Distribution. In the study of the Characins, as in that of all Tropical American fishes, the question of the distribution of the genera and species must in the future be among the first topics to be considered. In 1891 and 1892 Eigenmann and Eigenmann enumerated all the known THE CHARACIDAE. 31 Tropical American fishes. They (Proc. U. S. N. M., 14, 15) considered and summarized the distribution of the genera and species so far as known. They recognized sixty-five genera and about four hundred and sixty species, as com- pared with the forty genera and one hundred and eighty-one species enumer- ated by Gunther (1864). It is not necessary to give here the details of the results of their inquiry into the geographical distribution of the species. It was found that nineteen of the genera recognized were distributed over the entire eastern slope of South America and that five of these had representatives in the La Plata and the Amazon, but not in the small rivers emptying into the Atlantic in southeastern Brazil. One genus, Saccodon, was confined to the Pacific slope. Twenty-seven genera were limited to the Amazons, or to the Amazons and the region north of it. The Guianas held two peculiar genera, the Rio Magdalena one, the southeastern coast streams one, while four genera had a wide but irregular distribution. Many modifications in these summaries of distribution are necessary, both on account of the changes in the boundaries of the genera, and owing to the increase in our knowledge of the distribution of the several species. The papers published since the enumeration of 1891 and 1892 have dealt largely with the fauna of Paraguay, Rio Grande do Sul, Guiana, Colombia, and Mexico at nearly opposite ends of the range of the family and with the fauna of the Pacific slope of Ecuador. 1 A reconsideration of the entire problem of the dis- tribution of the fresh-water fishes of South America may be found in The fresh water fishes of Patagonia and an examination of the Archiplata-Archhelenis theory. (Reports of the Princeton university expeditions to Patagonia, 1909, 3, p. 225-374. Catalogue of the fresh-water fishes of tropical and south tem- perate America. Ibid., 1910, 3, p. 375-512. 1 While no attempt has been made to trace the details of the evolution of our knowledge of the African Characins the present account would be most inadequate and incomplete without reference to Boulenger's work on the Characins of the Congo and Nile Basins. The new genera and species from the Congo were described for the most part in volume 1 and 2 of the Annales Musee du Congo. A general account in which all the species were considered, formed part of his Les poissons du basin du Congo, 1901. The Nile representatives are described and figured in his superb volume, The fishes of the Nile, 1907. Among other recent authors on the African Characins is J. Pellegrin, who is describing the material of the Paris Museum. Finally Boulenger (Catalogue of the fresh-water fishes of Africa, 1909, 1, p. 174-298) redefines the subfamilies and genera and redescribes all of the African species. He recog- nizes twenty genera and one hundred species. 32 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Chronological List of Generic Names. Original name Date Current Name Charax Gnonow 1754 & 1777 Erythrinus Gronow 1756 & 1777 Gasteropelecus Gronow 1756 & 1777 Anostomus Gronow 1756 & 1777 Tetragonopterus Artedi 1758 Characinus Lacepede 1S02 Serrasalmo Lacepede 1S02 Curimates Cuvier 1815 Tetragonoptere Cuvier 1815 Les Curimates Cuvier 1817 Curimatus Les Anostomes Cuvier 1817 Anostomus Les Piabuques Cuvier 1817 Piabucus. Tetragonopterus Cuvier 1817 Myletes Cuvier 1817 Hydrocynus Cuvier 1817 Citharinus Cuvier 1817 Gasteropelecus Cuvier 1817 Erythrinus Cuvier 1817 Curimatus Oken 1817 Piabucus Oken 1817 Chalceus Cuvier 1818 Curimata Cloquet 1818 Hydrocyon Cuvier 1819 Hydrocynus Anodus Spix 1829 Prochilodus Agassiz 1829 Leporinus Spix 1829 Schizodon Agassiz 1829 Anostomus Rhaphiodon Agassiz 1829 Xiphostoma Spix 1829 Pacu Spix 1829 Prochilodus Cynodon Spix 1S29 Xiphorhynchus Agassiz 1829 Acestrorhynchus Salminus Agassiz 1829 Macrodon Miiller 1842 Hoplias Hemiodus Miiller 1842 Chilodus Miiller & Troschel 1844 Distichodus Miiller & Troschel 1844 Alestes Miiller & Troschel 1S44 Brycon Miiller & Troschel 1844 Exodon Miiller & Troschel 1S44 Epicyrtus Miiller & Troschel 1844 Charax Hydrolycus Miiller & Troschel 1844 Pygocentrus Miiller & Troschel 1844 Pygopristis Miiller & Troschel 1S44 Catoprion Miiller & Troschel 1844 THE CHARACIDAE. 33 Original name Date Current Name Myleus Muller & Troschel 1844 Xiphorhamphus Muller & Troschel 1845 Acestrorhamphus Agoniates Muller & Troschel 1845 Grundulus Cuv. & Valenciennes 1846 Lebiasina Cuv. & Valenciennes 1846 Pyrrhulina Cuv. & Valenciennes 1846 Parodon Cuv. & Valenciennes 1848 Brycinus Cuv. & Valenciennes 1848 Alestes? Piabucina Cuv. & Valenciennes 1848 Tometes Cuvier & Valenciennes 1848 Mylesinus Cuv. & Valenciennes 1848 Chalcinus Cuv. & Valenciennes 1S4S Cynopotamus Cuv. & Valenciennes 1848 Hydropardus Reinhardt 1849 Raphiodon Cheirodon Girard 1854 Astyanax Baird & Girard 1854 Poecilurichthys Gill 1858 Astyanax Hemigrammus Gill 1858 Stevardia Gill 1858 Corynopoma Gill 1858 Stevardia Nematopoma Gill 1858 Stevardia Microdus Kner 1859 Caenotropus Rhytiodus Kner 1859 Bryconops Kner 1859 Ctenolucius Gill 1861 Luciocharax Hydrocyonoides Castelnau 1861 Sarcodaces Crenuchus Giinther 1863 Pseudochalceus Kner 1863 Chalcinopsis Kner 1863 Brycon Saccodon Kner & Steindachner 1863 Caenotropus Giinther 1884 Brachyalestes Giinther 1864 Creatochanes Giinther 1864 Hemibrycon Giinther 1864 Scissor Giinther 1864 Creagrutus Giinther 1864 Anacyrtus Giinther 1864 Charax Roestes Giinther 1864 Roeboides Giinther 1864 Hystricodon Giinther 1864 Exodon Sarcodaces Giinther 1864 Oligosargus Giinther 1864 Ichthyborus Giinther 1865 Phago Giinther 1865 Piabina Reinhardt 1866 Characidium Reinhardt 1866 Nannocharax Giinther 1867 Xenocharax Giinther 1867 34 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Original name Date Current name Aphyocharax Giinther 1868 Megalobrycon Giinther 1869 Brycon Stethaprion Cope 1870 Holotaxis Cope 1870 Plethodeetes Cope 1870 Chalceus Odontostilbe Cope 1870 Laemolyta Cope 1871 Nannaethiops Giinther 1871 Iguanodectes Cope 1871 Nannostomus Giinther 1872 Bryconaethiops Giinther 1873 Leporellus Liitken 1874 Curimatopsis Steindachner 1S76 Liitkenia Steindachner 1876 Stichanodon Paragoniates Steindachner 1876 Bramocharax Gill 1877 Luciocharax Steindachner 1878 Elopomorphus Gill 1878 Potamorhina Cope 1878 Metynnis Cope 1878 Leptagoniates Boulenger 1887 Psectrogaster Eigenmann & Eigenmann 1889 Curimatella Eigenmann & Eigenmann 1889 Semitapicis Eigenmann & Eigenmann 1889 Henochilus Garman 1890 Schizodontopsis Garman 1S90 Laemolyta Pseudocorynopoma Perugia 1891 Bergia Steindachner 1891 Pseudocorynopor Chalcinopsis Holmberg 1891 Pseudocorynopor Neolebias Steindachner 1S94 Asiphonichthys Cope 1894 Chorimycterus Cope 1894 Diapoma Cope 1894 Petersius Hilgendorf 1894 Nanognathus Boulenger 1895 Hoplerythrinus Gill 1895 Eugnathichthys Boulenger 1898 Paraphago Boulenger 1899 Neoborus Boulenger 1899 Micralestes Boulenger 1899 Neolebias Boulenger 1899 Catabasis Eigenmann & Norris 1900 Mesoborus Pellegrin 1900 Hemistichodus Vaillant & Pellegrin 1900 Citharidium Boulenger 1902 Gymnocharacinus Steindachner 1903 Hoplias Gill 1903 Anisitsia Eigenmann & Kennedy 1903 . THE CHARACIDAE. 35 Original name Date Current Name Lahilliella Eigenmann & Kennedy 1903 Holoshesthes Eigenmann 1903 Holoesthes Holoprion Eigenmann 1903 Holopristis Eigenmann 1903 Pristella Markiana Eigenmann 1903 Moenkhausia Eigenmann 1903 Othonophanes Eigenmann 1903 Bryconodon Eigenmann 1903 Stichanodon Eigenmann 1903 Evermannella Eigenmann 1903 Eucinopotamus Acestrorhynchus Eigenmann 1903 Acestrorhamphus Eigenmann 1903 Acestrocephalus Eigenmann 1903 Boulengerella Eigenmann 1903 Gilbertella Eigenmann 1903 Gibertolus Aenodon Eigenmann 1903 Myleocollops Eigenmann 1903 Piaractus Eigenmann 1903 Orthomyleus Eigenmann 1903 Colosoma Eigenmann 1903 Mylosoma Eigenmann 1903 Eucinopotamus Fowler 1900 Ophiocephalops Fowler 190G Hoplerythrinus Copeina Fowler 1906 Cyphocharax Fowler 1906 Steindachnerina Fowler 1906 Peltapleura Fowler 1906 Eigenmannina Fowler 1906 Chilomyzon Fowler 1900 Prochilodus Hemiodopsis Fowler 1906 Pithecocharax Fowler 1906 Anostomus Poecilosomatops Fowler 1906 Characidium Garmanina Fowler 1906 Abramites Fowler 1906 Leporinus Pellegrinina Fowler 1906 ( haleeus Coscinoxyron Fowler 1906 Thoracocharax Fowler 1906 Cyrtocharax Fowler 1906 Cynopotamus Cynocharax Fowler 1906 Sphyraenocharax Fowler 1906 Acestrorhamphus Belonocharax Fowler 1906 Lucioeharax Waiteina Fowler 1900 Colosoma? Reganina Fowler 1906 Colosoma? Starksina Fowler 1906 Mylosoma Sealeina Fowler 1900 E\'ermannolns Eigenmann 1907 Eucinopotamus Gilbertolus Eigenmann 1907 Phenacogrammus Eigenmann 1907 36 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Original Name Date Current Name Pogonocharax Regan x 1907 Phoxinopsis Regan 1907 Mimagoniates Regan 1907 Ctenocharax Regan 1907 Grundulus Eobrycon Jordan 1907 Bryconamericus Eigenmann 1907 Deuterodon Eigenmann 1907 Phenaeogaster Eigenmann 1907 Astyanacinus Eigenmann 1907 Fowlerina Eigenmann 1907 Ephippicharax Joinvillea Steindachner 1908 Deuterodon Coelurichthys Ribeiro 1908 Gymnocorymbus Eigenmann 1908 Thayeria Eigenmann 1908 Ctenobrycon Eigenmann 1908 Pristella Eigenmann 1908 Psellogrammus Eigenmann 1908 Hyphessobrycon Durbin 1908 Brycochandus Eigenmann 1908 Poptella Eigenmann 1908 Champsoborus Boulenger 1909 Anostomoides Pellegrin 1909 Jobertina Pellegrin 1909 Pterodiseus Eigenmann 1909 Carnegiella Eigenmann 1909 Holobrycon Eigenmann 1909 Triurobrycon Eigenmann 1909 Brycon Poecilocharax Eigenmann 1909 Microcharax Eigenmann 1909 Poecilobrycon Eigenmann 1909 Archicheir Eigenmann 1909 Hollandichthys 1910 Nematobrycon Eigenmann 1911 Knodus Eigenmann 1911 Bivibranchia Eigenmann 1911 Hasemania Ellis 1911 Probolodus Eigenmann 1911 Psalidodon Eigenmann 1911 Spintherobolus Eigenmann 1911 Glandulocauda Eigenmann 1911 Hysteronotus Eigenmann 1911 Vesicatrus Eigenmann 1911 Apodastyanax Fowler 1911 Ctenobrycon. Rhodsia Fowler 1911 Parastremma Eigenmann 1912 Genycharax Eigenmann 1912 1 This is probably a Cyprinoid from Ceylon not a Characin from South America. THE CHARACIDAE. 37 Original name Gephyrocharax Eigenmann Pterobrycon Eigenmann Argopleura Eigenmann Microgenys Eigenmann Zygogaster Eigenmann Ephippicharax Fowler Prionobrama Fowler Gnathocharax Fowler Tyttocharax Fowler Xenurocharax Regan Landonia Eigenmann Phenagoniates Eigenmann & Wilson Microbrycon Eigenmann & Wilson Ceratobranchia Eigenmann Bleptonema Eigenmann Pareebasis Eigenmann Myocharax Fowler Xiphocharax Fowler Leptobrycon Eigenmann Macropsobrycon Eigenmann Megalamphodus Eigenmann Microschemobrycon Eigenmann Oligobrycon Eigenmann Aphyocheirodon Eigenmann Compsoura Eigenmann Mixobrycon Eigenmann Date Current name 1912 1913 1913 Bryconamericus 1913 1913 Astyanax 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1914 1914 Phanagoniates 1914 1914 1914 Prionobrama 1914 1914 1914 1915 1915 1915 1915 1915 1915 1915 1915 38 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. Whether we regard the Heterognaths as a single family, or as several fami- lies, the fact remains that there are few groups of fishes within which the lines of evolution are so clearly portrayed by existing forms as in the Characidae. In order more satisfactorily to discuss their evolution I have divided the family into a large number of small groups of genera with undoubted affinity. Several facts, aside from the general structure point to the Tetragonop- terinae or perhaps the closely allied Cheirodontinae as the group nearest to the ancestral Characins. 1 . Tetragonopterid fishes have been found fossil in the Tertiary fresh-water deposits at Taubate. 2. They are found both in Africa and South America, the most nearly allied genera on the two sides, Astyanax and Petersius, are scarcely generi- cally distinct. No other subfamily has representatives on both sides of the Atlantic. 3. They are the dominant groups both in Africa, where they form more than 36% of the Characins, and in America, where they form about 40%. 4. They are found over the entire area of distribution both in America and Africa. In America members of this subfamily form everywhere the vanguard in the distribution. 5. There are several lines of evolution diverging from the two subfamilies, Cheirodontinae and Tetragonopterinae. Some of the lines of evolution radiating from different sections of the Tetra- gonopterinae, or the closely allied Cheirodontinae are minor lines that have not diverged greatly. For instance Diapoma and Stevardia are Tetragonop- terids with modified opercles. The Gymnocharacinae are naked Tetragonop- terinae. The Crenuchinae are apparently an offshoot from the Cheirodontinae. The Stethaprioninae have developed a predorsal spine but are otherwise very close to Tetragonopterus and especially to Moenkhausia. The Mylinae and Serrasalmoninae have possibly diverged from the Stethaprioninae, increasing the number of the dorsal rays, increasing the depth, compressing the ventral surface, and adding spines and emphasizing the dentition without much alter- ing it. Another offshoot from the Cheirodontinae has given rise to a series of fishes with a decrease in the size of the mouth and the effectiveness of the THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 39 dentition. This series includes the Anastomatinae, Chilodinae, Prochilodinae, Hemiodontinae, Elopomorphinae, and finally, the toothless Curimatinae. Another fine diverging from the Cheirodontinae has given rise to the Sal- mininae, Characinae, Acestrorhamphinae, Cynodontinae, and ultimately the Hydrocyninae. Another line of divergence from the Cheirodon or Tetragonopterus group led through the Bryconinae, Iguanodectinae, Pyrrhulininae, Piabuscininae, to the Lebiasininae. A side branch from this leads to the Chalcininae which points the way to the flying Gasteropelicinae. For the above reasons it seems best to begin the detailed examination of the species with the Tetragonopterinae. It may be left an open question whether the African and American genera owe their similarity to convergence or to community of origin. They are for the most part small or minute fishes ranging from 50-200 mm. in length. Myletes in Africa reaches 460 mm. The Tetragonopterinae are closely related to the Cheirodontinae, Diapominae, Glandulocaudinae, Stethaprioninae, Bry- coninae and to other subfamilies. In shape they vary from the fusiform Creatochanes to the deeply compressed Tetragonopterus. In the majority of the genera the mouth is small. The lower jaw is heavy, and on account of the obliquity of the mouth, when the mouth is opened it is thrown forward, so as to project beyond the snout; when the mouth is closed the teeth of the lower jaw usually fit in behind the innermost series of the premaxillary. In some genera from Africa there is an inner pair of conical teeth in the lower jaw. These appear in lieu of an inner series of teeth which in the American Brycon are still present on the sides of the lower jaw. Conical teeth like these appear in isolated (not closely related) genera of other subfamilies both in Africa and America, and, since they cannot be genetically connected, appear to offer an example of homoplastic development. The skull is smooth in cross-section or slightly grooved in the smaller specimens; two fontanels are well developed in all the genera but Brycinus of Africa. In this genus there is no frontal fontanel. The bridge between the fontanels is either flush with the surface or sunk beneath it; the occipital process varies directly with the depth of the species, and serves to bridge the space between the skull and first interneurals, i. e. the space over the coalesced vertebrae which lack interneurals. In the deeper species the process is curved or bent upward and is long, reaching as much as one third of the distance of its base from the dorsal. In the slenderest species it is short and insignificant. It is always grooved to its tip, the groove leading to the parietal fontanel. 40 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. The eyes are always large, the species depending largely on living and moving food. The cheeks may be narrow or deep and are one third or entirely covered by the second suborbitals. The premaxillary teeth are always in at least two series. The inner series consists of from 4-12 graduated; three to many-pointed (a few may be conical) teeth arranged in a regular series. The outer row is very variable both in the group and in individual species and ranges from one or more teeth near the middle of the premaxillary, to a complete, compact series of teeth, narrower than those of the inner series in Tetragonopterus. If the outer row consists of four or more teeth the third tooth usually drops out of line and tends to form a third series of teeth. In Moenkhausia melanogramma the third tooth is entirely withdrawn from the line of the others. In the related Brycon in which the teeth are more numerous than in the genera of this subfamily, the fourth tooth and a few others also drop out of line and join the third tooth of the lower inner series which has moved forward. Other teeth of the inner series have also moved forward giving rise to a third series of teeth. A third series of teeth has independently arisen in Creagrutus and Bryconops, and in the Bryconinae. The maxillary may have no teeth, or a few may be crowded along the part of the margin nearest to the premaxillary, or it may have conical or tricuspid teeth along its entire margin. Usually the variation in any one species is very limited, but in Astyanax fasciatus nicaraguensis there is a variation of from one to nine teeth in the maxillary. The teeth in the lower jaw may all be alike and graduate, or the lateral teeth may be more or less abruptly smaller, the more abruptly the more proba- bly the lateral teeth will be conical. The larger teeth, 3-6 in number, may form a nearly transverse series or be arranged in a curve. The denticles of the individual teeth of the inner series of the premaxillary may be in a straight line, i. e., the teeth may be strictly incisors or, the line joining the cusps may be more and more curved so that it will be U-shaped, the open part of the U forward. The teeth in the lower jaw are usually the reverse of those of the inner series of the upper jaw. Gill-rakers are usually slender and not very long, they are all but absent in one genus, Scissor. The gill-membranes are free from each other, the nares close together. The breast is flat or rounded, never keeled. The scales are usually cycloid, rarely crenate or even ctenoid. They vary from 26 to about 60 in the lateral line, which is variously developed. The caudal may be naked, the scales of the sides passing on to its base and THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 41 ending in slightly enlarged scales, or the scales may become minute on the caudal adhering and covering the lobes to a greater or less extent. The anal may similarly have simply a basal sheath or may be covered to near its tip with minute scales. The scales may be regularly imbricate or in certain regions there may be interpolated rows. In some species there are but a few interpolated scales, i. e., a single series becomes divided into two above the anal. The point of division becomes more and more removed from the anal and the number of divided series increases. In long slender species, or larger-scaled, deep species, there are no interpolated rows. In deep, many-scaled species they sometimes become numerous. Closely allied species or even varieties may differ in this respect. In Astyanax fasciatus individuals with interpolated series are rarely found except in the Rio Parahyba where the usual variety has been entirely replaced by one with interpolated series. The dorsal is short, of between 9 and 12 rays, counting everything, and its origin is usually in the middle of the body. The adipose dorsal is small but almost always well developed. The caudal is always forked, the lobes equal or subequal, rarely markedly different. The anal is another variable element. Its origin usually below or behind the last dorsal ray may (Psello- grammus and Phenacogaster) fall below its origin. Other things being equal the deeper species have the larger number of anal rays. The number of rays varies from 10 to 48. The reach of the pectorals and ventrals varies with the shape of the fish. In deep species with long anal they overlap, in slender species they ordinarily do not reach each other. The notable exception to this is found in Gephyro- charax. The alimentary canal varies but little from the entire length of the fish. There are a few pyloric coeca. The air-bladders are large, the posterior about twice the length of the anterior, curved down behind in the deeper species. The range of color is limited. In life the caudal of the male is frequently cherry-red, the dorsals and anal (and caudal in females) are frequently yellow. A shoulder-spot of varying shape is usually present. There is usually a silvery lateral band overlying a black band which becomes evident in formalin prepara- tions. There is frequently a dark spot on the base of the caudal which is often continued on the middle caudal rays. In Moenkhausia dichrourus and Brycona- mericus exodon the tips or bands across the caudal lobes are dark. In Moenk- 42 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. hausia lepidurus and the species of Creatochanes the middle rays and upper caudal lobes are black. In Astyanax lineatus and A. steindachneri, in Moenk- hausia latissimus, and in Hollandichthys and Pseudochalceus dark lines follow the spaces between successive rows of scales. The dorsal and anal are marked with black in a few species. The points of greatest variability within a genus are: — 1. The depth and all that this carried with it, length of occipital process, rows of scales, number of rays of anal. 2. The size of the mouth and the dentition. 3. The degree of armature of the cheek. 4. The scaling of the caudal, anal, predorsal, and preventral areas. 5. The degree of development of the lateral line. Contrasted Generic Characters. The following mutually exclusive characters are found variously combined in different genera. The characters appearing in the largest number of genera are given in the first column. A. Caudal fin naked. a. B. Lateral line complete. b. C. Maxillary with few teeth or none. c. V. Premaxillary teeth in two series. d. E. Cheeks partly naked. e. F. Anterior edge of maxillary a simple /. curve. G. Predorsal line scaled. g. H. Teeth of the sides of the dentary h. abruptly smaller. I. Premaxillary meeting the maxillary of an i. angle. J. Scales entire. j- 3- K. Anal naked except at the base. k. L. Lateral line nearly straight. /. M. Preventral area with normal scales. m. N. Gill-rakers setiform. n. 0. Adipose fin present. o. P. Origin of anal behind origin of dorsal. p. Q. Caudal without glandular scales. q. Caudal scaled. Lateral line incomplete. Maxillary with teeth along its entire edge. Premaxillary teeth in three series. Cheeks entirely covered by the third sub- orbital. Anterior edge of maxillary sigmoid. Predorsal line naked. Teeth of the sides of the dentary gradu- ated. Maxillary-premaxillary border a simple curve. Scales ctenoid. Scales crenate. Anal scaled to near its tip. Lateral line sharply decurred in front. Preventral area with paired scales. Gill-rakers lanceolate. Adipose fin wanting. Origin of anal under or in front of origin of dorsal. Caudal with glandular scales. The characters appearing in the larger number of genera and given in the first column are all found in Astyanax, which may for that reason, be the central, THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 43 possibly the most primitive member, of the subfamily. Poecilurichthys, which differs from it only in having the character I instead of L, is scarcely distin- guishable. 1 The different characters of the first column are found in various combina- tions with most of the characters of the second column. Thus A is found in combination with all (not counting its contrasted character, a) except k and I. B is found in combination with all but o and p. C is found in combination with all the characters of the second column and the same is true of all the rest of the characters of the first column. POLYPHYLETIC CHARACTERS. It is quite certain that the characters of the right-hand column of the contrasted generic characters have sometimes, at least, been independently derived from the characters of the left-hand column, not only by the different genera possessing the character, but sometimes by different species of the same genus. That is, some of the genera possessing characters given in the second column are of polyphyletic origin. Beginning at the bottom of the list, the character o is found in Hasemania from southeastern Brazil, and in the very different genus, Nematobrycon, from the west of the western Cordilleras of Colombia. The two genera are not related, and are widely separated geographically. There can be no doubt but that they have independently lost the adipose fin. The next undoubted case is that indicated by g. This character is found in Poecilurichthys, scarcely distinct from Astyanax, and in Gymnocorymbus, a very different fish. Here again the character has very probably been inde- pendently acquired by the two genera. 1 In Indiana Univ. Studies, 1914, No. 20, I have tried to carry the inference a step further. "The common possessions of all members of the Tetragonopterina; enumerated above, permit us to picture the ancestral type of the subfamily. In brief, it must have been a fish similar in most char- acters to Astyanax fasciatus Cuvier. This species, besides possessing all the characters common to all members of the subfamily, possesses also many of those positive (as contrasted with absent) characters enumerated for the family, and lacks some characters, like the highly specialized scaling of the ventral surface, ctenoid scales, extreme length of anal, extreme development of second suborbital, which are evidently highly specialized characters in a few of the genera. It is more widely distributed than any other species and has given rise to numerous variations. It represents an average in length of head (4.3), depth, (2.6-3); length of anal (about 30); scales (about 38); size of eye (2.5-3); general shape (compressed subfusiform) ; position of dorsal (its base being in the space above the origins of the ventral and anal) ; size of mouth ; and the characters of the teeth. The fossil fishes found at Taubate — south of Rio de Janeiro — are similar to it in most char- acters. They are a little larger and may be members of the genus Brycon. In all but the teeth, they are very similar to Astyanax fasciatus." 44 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. The next case is that of e, the enlarged third suborbital. This character is found in Knodus with a scaled caudal and in Creagrutus, Piabina, and Brycon- americus with a naked caudal. The last three genera are undoubtedly closely related and for the present purpose count as one. Knodus is a Bryconamericus in all but its scaled caudal. We are, therefore, compelled to assume either that if the ancestors of Knodus had the caudal scaled, that it has paralleled Brycon- americus in the character of its cheek or that if its ancestors were identical with those of the latter genus that its caudal has independently acquired scales. The case presented by the character d, three rows of premaxillary teeth, is much simpler and clearer. This character is found in Microgenys, Creagratus, Piabina, and Bryconops. It is quite certain that the latter genus has been derived from an ancestor like Creatochanes and that the others have been de- rived from an Astyanax-like ancestor. Microgenys, Creagratus, and Piabina, on the one hand, and Bryconops on the other, have independently acquired three series of teeth. In this case the steps by which this has been accomplished are indicated in a variety of species of the subfamily. In many species alternate teeth of the front series of the premaxillary are withdrawn from the line of the rest, thus forming an incipient third series. In Moenkhausia melogramma and in Bryconamericus exodon this process has almost yielded additional genera with three series of teeth. The modification from one to the other condition is a perfectly progressive one, without notable breaks or saltations. The next character c, teeth along the entire maxillary, has again been inde- pendently derived from C several times. Here we have not only the evidence of several distinct, not closely related, genera which have the character but also the evidence from changing species. I have elsewhere called attention to some specimens referred to as Aslyanas aeneus nicaraguensis. Of thirty-five specimens from Lake Nicaragua, there are nine with two teeth, two with three teeth, five with four teeth, five with five teeth, five with six teeth, five with seven teeth, three with eight teeth and one with nine teeth in the maxillary. The normal number is two. Phenacogaster is in a similar state of transition. Pris- tella, Hemibrycon, Nematobrycon, Hollandichthys, and Pseudochalceus have acquired complete dentition for their maxillaries in at least three independent groups. The most interesting and conclusive evidence of the independent origin of the same character in different genera is presented by the character b, the incompleteness of the lateral line. Not only have we the evidence from widely divergent genera with this character, but we again have species in a state of true mutation. Most remarkable of all is one species of which I have been able THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 45 to examine hundreds of specimens from the Amazon, not one of which showed signs of mutation, while the specimens coming from another region are in an evident state of mutation. Genera with a complete lateral line and the genera with an incomplete lateral line to which they have given rise are : — Genera with lateral line complete. Genera with lateral line incomplete Tetragonopterus none. Entomolepis none. Moenkhausia Hemigrammus (further changed into Pristella and Thayeria) Astyanax Hyphessobrycon (into Hasemania). Knodus none. Markiana none. Gymnocorymbus none. Ctenobrycon Psellogrammus. Creatochanes Brycochandus. Bryconops none. Creagrutus none. Piabina none. Microgenys none. Bryconamericus none. Zygogaster none. Ceratobranchia none. Landonia none. Deuterodon none. Hemibrycon Hollandichthys, Pseudochalceus, and Nematobrycon. Phenacogaster Vesicatrus. Scissor none. Henochilus none. Psalidodon none. The deviation is so evident in a number of cases that the polyphyletic origin of the character 6, an incomplete lateral line, is beyond the faintest shadow of a doubt. Without considering sporadic individuals of otherwise constant species, the species which are undoubtedly mutuating at the present time are Hemi- grammus inconstans, Moenkhausia cotinho, Phenacogaster beni, Astyanax mutator, and Hyphessobrycon poecilioides. The details for these species are given under their descriptions. Another species which has crossed the line but has not reached a state of equilibrium is Psellogrammus kennedyi. Many of the details of this species are again given under the proper caption. Of Ctenobrycon hauxwellianus I have been able to examine over fourteen hundred specimens from various places on the Amazon. In all of these the lateral line is complete. In at least six specimens out of nineteen from the Lagoa 46 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Parnagua, Paranahyba basin, the lateral line "stutters." This species, in other words, is mutuating at Parnagua. Moenkhausia cotinho is similarly locally mutating and the same seems to be true of Hyphessobrycon poecilioides and Astyanax fasciatus. The scaling of the caudal I am not able to cope with satisfactorily. It is certain that it has several times been acquired independently by different members of the family, if not by different members of the subfamily under consideration. Selective Grouping of Characters. Another line of inquiry leads us to consider whether the contrasted unit char- acters are entirely combined as if by chance or whether there is a selected com- bination. The characters from g-q are found in but one or two genera and these may be omitted from the discussion since they would needlessly complicate it. Taking only the first six pairs of contrasted characters, there are 62 or 64 possible combinations. Considering each combination a distinct genus we should have 64 genera, without considering the characters between g and q. In reality we have but about half as many. Taking only the first three characters we should have eight possible com- binations. An examination of the genera shows that six of these combinations are actually found, but not by any means in the same proportions. If we take the first four characters, each of which has probably several times, and inde- pendently, been modified into its contrasted character, these four pairs give us sixteen possible combinations. Of these only eight actually occur. A certain amount of selective grouping is thus found, if we take only three contrasted pairs of characters, a greater amount of selective omission if we take four pairs and this increases rapidly as we increase the number of contrasted forms. It is evident that either many of the possible combinations have never arisen, or, having appeared, they have not been preserved. POLYPHYLETIC GENERA. In my paper, Indiana University Studies, 1914, no. 20, I wrote — "This independent origin of characters is responsible for the fact that some of the accepted genera of the Tetragonopterinse are of polyphyletic origin, i. e. our definitions of genera are in many cases enumerations of characters frequently independently acquired, not enumerations of the characters of the ancestral type of the genus from which the species have diverged. A result of this independent divergence is that frequently in a restricted, isolated area the species of different genera represented in the area are more nearly related to each other than to members of their own genera in remote regions. For instance Astyanax THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 47 festce and Bryconamericus peruanus of the Pacific slope of Ecuador are more intimately related than festa is to Astyanax anterior of the upper Amazon. And in this case, Astyanax brevi- rostris or Bryconamericus brevirostris whichever it may be, is intermediate between the two. I am not competent to say whether brevirostris is moving from Bryconamericus to become an Astyanax, or whether it has just completed the reverse process. Certainly festa and brevirostris are more intimately related, have had a common ancestor at a less remote time, than either of them with an Astyanax or Bryconamericus of southeastern Brazil. We recognize two types of genera, one a group of closely related species, descended from a common ancestor and having certain distinguishing characters in common. Phena- cogaster is such a genus. The peculiar scaling of the ventral surface has been developed but once; and the species are all closely allied, differing from each other in but a few char- acters. The other, a polyphyletic type, consists of species having a certain combination of definite characters in common which easily distinguish members of the genus, but which, instead of indicating a single ancestral line from which the species have diverged, are acquired possibly one at a time along distinct lines converging to a common definition. Sometimes the polyphyletic origin can be detected, sometimes not. Bryconamericus seems to me to be such a genus; Hemibrycon, Deuterodon, and the larger genera are probably also polyphyletic. " Since it is difficult, or impossible, to say in any case which of the given characters has appeared first, it is extremely difficult to point out lines of evolution leading to different gen- era or species. We can only insist that certain innate possibilities may become actualities anywhere along the line, possibly wherever they may prove advantageous, though the advan- tage, to say the least, is not always obvious. " We may be permitted to assume that the more frequent character is the primitive one, although this is certainly not always a safe assumption." Deuterodon with the character h is a genus of polyphyletic origin. Deu- terodon iquape is found in southeastern Brazil, Deuterodon nasatus in Central America. These two species technically belong to the same genus, genetically they are most certainly not derived from an immediate common ancestor and it is very probable that Deuterodon pinnatus and Deuterodon potaroensis from Guiana, and Deuterodon acanthogaster from the Paraguay, are also independent derivatives from the genus Astyanax. A somewhat similar case is presented by a character not mentioned in the list, because I hesitate to propose a generic designation for it. It is this: — In the vast majority of the species of Characins, the innominate bone is feeble and entirely concealed. In Deuterodon acanthogaster and in Astijanax mucrona- tus, this bone has become firm and the anterior end projects out of the body as a distinct spine. There is no doubt whatever that this modification is arising independently in the two species. It must be quite evident from the foregoing that the subfamily is a paradise for the student of divergent evolution. But the very conditions that make it of interest to the student of evolution make it the despair of the systematist whose object is to express relationship by grouping the species in an orderly ■ array of genera and the individuals in an orderly array of species, always, if 48 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. possible, in the form of the conventional phylogenic tree. In order to better express the relationship of smaller groups of species the genera have been made as small as consistent with facts. The Tetragonopterinae seem to form an interlacing fabric rather than a branching tree. An illustration of the interest and difficulty is given by the series of genera Poecilurichthys, Ctenobrycon, Psellogrammus. The genus Poecilurichthys as here understood, grades in- sensibly into the genus Astyanax, and perhaps should have been retained united with the latter. Be that as it may, P. spilurus is much more closely related to Ctenobrycon hauxwellianus than it is to any species of either Poe- cilurichthys or Astyanax, and yet there is scarcely a technical character by which it can be separated from the remaining species of Poecilurichthys and united with Ctenobrycon. The latter is sharply distinguished by ctenoid scales from all other members of the subfamily. In an another direction, the speci- mens of Ctenobrycon hauxwellianus from Paranagua form a complete bridge so far as the technical characters are concerned, between the genera Ctenobrycon and Psellogrammus. From the parental form, P. spilurus, the Amazonian Ctenobrycon hauxwellianus has become generically distinct. C. hauxwellianus in its turn, in Paranagua, is becoming and, in Paraguay, has developed the char- acter which distinguishes Psellogrammus. The difficulties of the systematist could of course be obviated by retaining all of these things in the single old genus Tetragonopterus, but this procedure would neither remove the facts nor explain them. I have attempted to express the relationship of the genera by the accom- panying diagram, in which Astyanax occupies the center, and in which it is made to appear that the scaled caudal has appeared once, of which I am not at all certain, and in which the line of the outer ellipse indicates the boundary within which the lateral line is complete. This boundary has been crossed many times and by different radiating lines. Fig. 1. — The genera Astyanax, and Moenkhausia, within the central oval, are closely allied and the difference between them is partly bridged by the species M. intermedia. They are considered typical and central for the subfamily. From Moenkhausia have radiated directly Markiana, Gymnocorymbus, Tetragonopterus, and Entomolepis. It is left in doubt whether the genera Hemigrammus and Hyphesso- brycon have diverged independently from Moenkhausia and Astyanax, and then converged till now only the scaled and naked condition of the caudal separate them, or whether they have been derived from one of the above and then developed or lost the caudal scales. The same applies to the genera Brycon- americus and Knodus. The species Astyanax mutator and Hyphessobrycon proteus furnish bridges between Hyphessobrycon and Astyanax. Moenkhausia colinho and Hemigrammus inconslans furnish a similar bridge between Hemigrammus and Moenkhausia. From Astyanax many lines have radiated, some of which have been continued beyond the line of the outer oval, which indicates that their lateral line has become broken. Where a bridge exists between the so-called genera this has been indicated by extending the name of the genus beyond its boundary or by supplying the name of the species which constitutes the bridge in brackets. The origin of two of the radial lines is uncertain, a fact indicated by an interro- gation point. Cheir °aom, m Rho&dsins I^uanodecLinee. Figure 1. 50 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Key to the Genera. a. Upper lip covering the teeth of the premaxillary ; dentary with a single series of teeth. b. Some or all of the teeth serrate or notched. c. Gill-rakers setiform or branched. d. Preventral area with a median series of scales or with normal scales irregularly arranged, or more or less trenchant with the scales of the two sides bent over the middle. e. Maxillary border a simple more or less pronounced curve, or with a break in the symi letry of the curve at the end of the tooth bearing portion. /. Caudal fin at least partly covered with small, normal scales. g. Lateral line complete (see also under Hemigrammus inconstans, Moenkhausia cotinho). h. Predorsal area with a median series of scales which are not notably smaller than the other scales; D. 10-11. i. Anal with a basal sheath of scales, its margin straight or emarginate. j. Lateral line much decurved in front, frequently several odd scales in front between it and the next regular series; depth at least half the length; pre- ventral area flat with sharply bent scales on the sides; profile depressed over the eyes; occipital crest 5 of the distance from its base to the dorsal; outer series of premaxillary teeth complete; anal long . . 1. Tetragonoptcrus Cuvier. jj. Lateral line little decurved, parallel with the row of scales below it. k. Scales crenulate; an enlarged scale on each side of the base of the occipital crest 2. Entomolepis Eigenmann. kk. Scales entire; no enlarged scale on sides of the occipital crest. {I. Preventral area trenchant Slichonodonlinae) . II. Preventral area rounded. (m. A procumbent predorsal spine Slethaprioninae). mm. No procumbent predorsal spine. n. Second suborbital leaving a naked area between it and the lower limb of the preopercle; at least five teeth in the inner row of the premaxillary; outer series of premaxillary teeth in a line parallel with the inner series except that one tooth frequently retreats from the line of the others 3. Moenkhausia Eigenmann. nn. Second suborbital in contact with the subopereulum below; four teeth in the inner row of the premaxillary. Similar to Brycon- amerieus 4. Knodus Eigenmann. ii. Anal scaled to near its tip; caudal unequally lobed; anal margin convex. 5. Markiana Eigenmann. hh. Predorsal line largely naked, a few scales of the sides near the dorsal with their margins bent over the back; D. 11 or 12; ventrals in front of the dorsal; anal emarginate or rounded 6. Gymnocorymbus ' Eigenmann. gg. Lateral line incomplete. o. Lower caudal lobe much the longer; maxillary without teeth. 7. Thayeria Eigenmann. on. Caudal lobes equal or subequal. p. Maxillary with teeth along its entire length. 8. Prislella Eigenmann. pp. Maxillary teeth, if present, crowded on the upper anterior angle. 9. Hemigrammus Gill. ff. Caudal fin naked except at its base. 1 Poptella (Slethaprioninae) is almost identical with this genus but contains a hidden predorsal spine. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 51 q. Premaxillary teeth in two series. r. Second suborbital not in contact with the preopercle below, or with 5 teeth in the inner series of the premaxillary. 8. Lateral line incomplete. See Psellogrammus. /. Few teeth if any near the upper angle of the premaxillary. u. An adipose fin 10. Hyphessobrycon Durbin. uu. No adipose fin 11. Ease-mania Ellis. It. Maxillary with teeth along its entire edge. v. Anterior teeth of the lower jaw all alike, tricuspid; anterior pair of premaxillary teeth little larger than the rest ... 12. Hollandichthys Eigenmann. w>. Lateral teeth of lower jaw enlarged, the fourth usually largest; middle teeth of premaxillary much enlarged 13. Pseudochalceus Kner. (vvv. Anterior teeth of the lower jaw all alike, multi- cuspid ; caudal scaled . . 8. Pristella Eigenmann) . ss. Lateral line complete. w. Teeth of the sides of the lower jaw more or less abruptly minute, x. Maxillary-premaxillary border angulated where they meet. y. Scales cycloid. 14. Astyanax Baird & Girard. (z. Predorsal line scaled Astyanax. zz. Predorsal line at least partly naked. Poecilurichthys Gill). yy. Scales ctenoid at least on breast; anal long, 39-47, predorsal line scaled. A. Lateral line complete. 15. Ctenobrycon Eigenmann. A A. Lateral line stuttering. 16. Psellogrammus Eigenmann. xx. Maxillary-premaxillary border a continuous curve, half as long as the head. 17. Astyanacinus Eigenmann. ww. Teeth of the lower jaw all alike in character and regularly graduate from in front to the last tooth on the sides; two teeth in the front row of the premaxillary on each side; teeth of the second row multicuspid incisors with a contracted base, their anterior and posterior surfaces alike, convex, without dis- tinct ridges. ... 18. Deuterodon Eigenmann. ivww. Teeth of the lower jaw similar, the lateral ones much wider than the anterior ones; maxil- lary with two very broad incisors whose combined width is about half the length of the maxillary .... 19. Landonia Eigenmann. rr. Second suborbital in contact with the lower limb of the pre- opercle; four teeth in the inner series of the premaxillary. 52 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. B. No adipose fin ; lateral line incomplete ; outer and middle caudal rays of the male filiform. 20. Nematobrycon Eigenmann. BB. Adipose fin present. C. Anal very short, with but ten rays. 21. Microgenys Eigenmann. CC. Anal moderate or long. D. Outer row or premaxillary teeth the dominant one. Gill-rakers branched. 22. Ceralobranchia Eigenmann. DD. Inner row of premaxillary teeth at least as well developed as the outer. Gill-rakers simple. E. Few teeth along the upper por- tion of the maxillary. 23. Bryconamericus Eigenmann. (F. Males with a pouch covered with scales at the base of the caudal. Argopkura Eigenmann. FF. Males without a pouch on the caudal. Bryconamericus.) EE. Teeth along the greater part or along the entire edge of the maxillary. 24. Hemibrycon Gunther. qq. Premaxillary teeth in three series. G. Anal short of not more than 14 rays. 25. Crcagrutus Gunther. GG. Anal of 20 or more rays. 26. Piabina Reinhardt. ee. Maxillary border meeting premaxillary border at a right angle, its upper anterior margin then describing a quarter circle and continued in a direction nearly parallel with that of the premaxillary border; maxillary slender, partially slipping under the preorbital and first suborbital for nearly its entire length. Plate 2, fig. 5. H. Lateral line incomplete. 27. Brycochandus Eigenmann. HH. Lateral line complete. /. Premaxillary teeth five-pointed, in an outer row of 6-10 teeth; anterior man- dibular teeth strong- er than those of the premaxillary, 10-12 in number; sides of THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 53 the lower jaw with a long row of very small single-pointed teeth. 28. Creatochanes Giinther. //. Premaxillary teeth in three series. 29. Bryconops Kner. (dd. Preventral area compressed, the scales of the two sides separated by a series of narrow median scales, the marginal scales of the two sides with their lower margins straight; outer ventral rays filiform Zygogasler Eigenmann '). ddd. Preventral area with two series of large overlapping scales; origin of anal in advance of the origin of the dorsal or but little behind it; premaxillary with an inner series com- posed of several tricuspid and several conical teeth; the outer series of the premaxillary of two or three tricuspid and usually one or more conical teeth. /. Lateral line com- plete; caudal naked. 30. Phenocogasler Eigenmann. JJ. Incomplete lateral line. 31. Vesicatrus Eigenmann. 66. Teeth all conical; mouth very large, the lower jaw entering the profile. 32. Genycharax Eigenmann. cc. Gill-rakers short, lanceolate; anal long (29); lateral line complete; maxillary with conical teeth along half of its length; premaxillary and mandibular teeth as in Tetragonopterus. 33. Scissor Giinther. aa. Upper lip not covering the premaxillary teeth. K. Premaxillary teeth in a main outer series and a minor inner series of two or more teeth; a pair of conical teeth behind the main series of the man- dibulary teeth in front. 34. Henochilus Garman. KK. Premaxillary with one series of teeth; no conical teeth in the lower jaw. 35. Psalidodon Eigenmann. 1 This has been made a subgenus of Astyanax. 54 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. 1. Tetragonopterus Cuvier. rerpas four, yuwla angle, TTTepoe, to, wing = square winged. Tetragonopterus Artedi, Seba, Locupl. rerum, 1758, 3, pi. 34, fig. 3, (argenteus). Tetragonopterus Cuvier, Regne animal, 1817, 2, p. 166, (argenteus). Eigenmann, Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1910, 3, p. 438. Type. — Tetragonopterus argenteus Cuvier. Small fishes, pug-nosed, much compressed and very deep, the depth at least half the length; humped at the occiput, concave over the eyes; interorbital broad, rounded; snout very short, the maxillary nearly vertical; nostrils sepa- rated by a valve; a long frontal fontanel extending beyond middle of eye; parietal fontanel continued as a groove to the tip of the occipital crest, which reaches £ to the dorsal; cheek largely covered by the suborbital; opercle very short (nearly four times as high as long, in the type) ; premaxillary teeth in two rows, the teeth of the outer series small, of nearly uniform size, the row more or less regular, the teeth of the inner series larger, graduated, multicuspid, the cusps of each tooth arranged in a curve, the middle cusp much the longest; several large, graduated, several pointed teeth in the front of the lower jaw, abruptly minute teeth on the sides; maxillary with or without teeth on its upper anterior edge; gill-membranes entirely free from the isthmus; gill-rakers long, slender; fins all well developed, the anal long, 32-37; scales entire, large on the middle of the sides, becoming smaller in all directions, notably toward front of anal 1 ; lateral fine complete, much decurved, several scales between its origin and that of the regular series below it, caudal scaled; preventral area flat, bounded by sharp angles, a median series of scales on the breast; seven or more series of scales between the lateral line and the dorsal; postventral surface trenchant; tongue thick, but little free. Vertebrae 10 + 19; alimentary canal about 1.4 the length over all. This genus, most nearly allied to Moenkhausia, is readily distinguished from it by the greatly decurved lateral fine which is not parallel with the row of scales' below it in front. Habitat. — Orinoco and Guianas, Amazons and south to Rio de Janeiro and La Plata. 1 In a specimen of T. argenteus the exposed edge of the 9th scale of the lateral line is about twice as high as the exposed edge of the 4th, equal to two scales just below the beginning of the dorsal, greater than the width of the flat ventral surface, equal to the scales of the lateral line plus the series above and below it on the caudal peduncle, or equal to | the depth of the caudal peduncle. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 55 Key to the Species. A. 36 or 37; depth 1.6-1.8 rarely 2; eye in adult less than interorbital; scales toward occiput decreasing in size; occipital process bordered by 5-7 scales on each side; caudal lobes scaled for about half their length; distance of dorsal from tip of snout greater than the distance of the ventrals from tip of snout; ventrals equidistant from tip of snout and last third or last fourth of anal; pectorals reaching beyond origin of ventrals; 12 to 16 azygous, predorsal scales. 1. argenteus Cuvier. A. 32 or 33; depth 1.66-2; eye in adult at least equal to the interorbital; occipital process bor- dered by 3 or 4 scales on each side; caudal lobes densely scaled to near their tip; dorsal and ventrals about equidistant from tip of snout; ventrals equidistant from tip of snout and end of anal; pectorals usually not reaching origin of ventrals; 8 or 9 azygous predorsal scales. Scales 7-29 to 34-3.5; a caudal spot 2. chalceus Agassiz. A. 32; depth 1.66; eye 2.7 in the head, a little less than the interorbital, which is 2.33 in the head; pectorals reaching a little beyond origin of the ventrals; scales 8.5-31-4.5; caudal scaled to its tip 3. huberi Steindachner. A. 31-33; depth 1.66-1.8; eye 2.2-2.4 in the head, greater than interorbital; ventrals nearer the snout than the dorsal, equidistant from snout and last fourth of the anal; pectorals reach- ing past origin of ventrals; scales 7-28 to 29-3.5 to 4 4. gibbosus Steindachner. 1. Tetragonopterus argenteus Cuvier. Plate 2, fig. 1; Plate 4, fig. 2. Tetragonoplerus argenteus Cuvier, Mem. Mus. hist, nat., 1848, 4, p. 455 (Bahia?) ; Muller & Troschel, Horae ichthyol., 1845, 1, p. 13 (Brazil & Guiana); Fische British Guiana, 1848, p. 634 (Amucu); Cuvier & Valenciennes Hist. nat. poissons, 1848, 22, p. 132 (Bahia?) ; Kner, Characinen, 1S59, p. 38 (Cujaba; Guiana); Gunther, Cat. fishes Brit, mus., 1864, 6, p. 318; Steindachner, Ichthyol. beitr., 1876, 6, p. 46 (Santarem); Flussf. Sudamer., 1879, 1, p. 7 (Orinoco, near Ciudad Bolivar); 1S82, 4, p. 13 (Amazons, Iquitos); Eigenmann & Eigenmann, Proc. U. S. N. M., 1891, 14, p. 52; Ulrey, Ann. N. Y. acad. sci., 1895, 8, p. 273; Boulenger, Trans. Zool. soc. London, 1896, 14, p. 35 (Descalvados, Northern Paraguay); Pellegrin, Bull. Mus. hist, nat., 1899, 6, p. 157 (Apurc; Manaos) ; Boulenger, Boll. Mus. univ. Torino, 1900, 15, no. 370, p. 2 (Urucum) ; Eigenmann, Ann. Carnegie mus., 1907, 4, p. 126, fig. 10 (Puerto Murtinho; Bahia Negra); Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1900, 3, p. 439; Mem. Carnegie mus., 1912, 6, p. 319, fig. 37 (Tumatumari) ; Fowler, Proc. Acad. nat. sci., Phil., 1914, p. 242 (Rupununi). 1 Tetragonoplerus rufipes Valenciennes, d'Orbigny, Voy. Amer. Merid. Poissons, 1847, pi. 11, fig. 1 (Buenos Aires); Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. nat. poissons, 1848, 22, p. 136 (Buenos Aires); Gunther, Cat. fishes Brit, mus., 1864, 6, p. 318 (Buenos Aires); Eigenmann & Eigenmann, Proc. U. S. N. M., 1891, 14, p. 52; Perugia, Ann. Mus. civ. storia nat. Genova, 1891, ser. 2, 10, p. 42 (Candclaria, Rio Parana; Rio Paraguay at Asuncion); Lahille, Rev. Mus. de la Plata, 1895, 6, p. 7 (Punta Lara, Isla Santiago); Ulrey, Ann. N. Y. acad. sci., 1895, 8, p. 272. 2 1 Tetragonopterus argenteus about 100 mm. Cuvier's type (said to contain thirty-four anal rays by Cuvier and forty by Valenciennes) has thirty-seven and a half anal rays; dorsal broken. Lateral line 30; a dark vertical bar at origin of caudal; two vertical bars behind the head. 2 The types, three specimens, of T. rufipes in the Jardin des Plantes from Buenos Aires are in bad condition; they are 100, 110, and 118 mm. long. Those are evidently the ones figured and described by Valenciennes who wrote the label. They have A. 37; interorbital slightly convex. It is impossible in their state of disintegration to distinguish them from T. argenteus, with which they are very probably identical. I have not seen the type of T. sawa. 56 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Tetragonopterus sawa Castelnau, Exped. Amer. Sud. Poissons, 1855, p. 65, pi. 33, fig. 1 (Rio Coxas). Telragonopterus chalceus Eigenmann & Kennedy (non Agassiz), Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 1903, p. 523 (Rio Paraguay; Arroyo Trementina). Habitat. — From the Orinoco and Guiana to the Paranahyba basin, Ama- zons and Paraguay, Parana to Buenos Aires. Not in the coastwise streams between Buenos Aires and the Paranahyba. It is rare in Guiana and the only species in the La Plata basin. Specimens examined. Catalogue Number of number specimens Size in mm. Locality Collector 18982 2 3 80-125 Tabatinga Bourget 20793 20794 20797 15 55-125 Hyavary Bourget 20799 820 1 119 Fonte Boa Fletcher 20748 1 118 Fonte Boa Agassiz 20819 7 70-130 19a James 20745 14 65-115 Tocantins Agassiz f James, 20859 3 100-110 Jutahy Thayer, I Talisman 20822 2 100-115 San Paolo James 20726 4 87-104 Agassiz 20728 6 69- 85 Lake Hyanuary Agassiz 20976 1 29982 J > 6 75-about 130 Lago Alexo Thayer 20741 5 68- 84 Tajapurii Agassiz 2071S 4 71- 7S Villa Bella Agassiz 20847 1 60 Obidos Bentos 20776 ' 20777 20786 13 49- 85 Santarem Bourget. 20791 27729 ? 9 63- 85 Monte Alegre Agassiz 20953 1 83 Jatuarana Navez 2978* 2. 2 69- 72 San Joaquin, Guapore basin Haseman 2976 < D. 4 67- 86 Santarem Haseman 21007 1 about 90 Jose Fernandez Coutinho 21052 1 21053 J 64-108 Rio Puty, into Rio Paranahyba St. John. 1 1 have also examined the types of T. argenteus and T. rufipes. 8 Numbers without designation indicate the Museum of Comparative Zoology; C. = Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh; I. = Indiana University; U. = U. S. National Museum. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 57 Catalogue number Number of specimens Size in mm. 21051 75» 66-107 21056 12 bad 10022 I. 10023 I. 10253 I. 1 2 3 about 90 about 56-about 85 about 82-about 95 10255 I. S 2 about 64-100 1489 C. 1 67 3317 C. 3 24-104 3318 C. 1 33 3319 C. 35 38- 96 2977 C. 2979 C. 3 1 28- 80 55 to base of caudal 2980 C. 4 58- 67 Locality Collector Rio Puty St. John. San Goncallo, Rio Paranahyba St. John. Arroyo Trementina, Paraguay Anisits. Asuncion, Paraguay Anisits. Bahia Negra, Paraguay Anisits. Puerto Murtinho, Paraguay Anisits. Tumatumari, Brit. Guiana Eigenmann. Asuncion, Paraguay Haseman. Sapucay, Paraguay Haseman. Villa Hays, Paraguay Haseman. Corumba, Rio Paraguay Haseman. Rio Jauru, into Rio Paraguay Haseman. Caceres, Rio Paraguay Haseman. This species can always be readily distinguished by its great depth and the two vertical humeral bars. The latter, though in some cases shadowy, are evident in all of the specimens examined. Head 3-3.66; depth 1.6-1.8, rarely 2; D.ll; A. usually 36 or 37 3 ; scales 7 to 9-32 to 35-3 £-5- 4 Eye 2.25 in the young, 3 in the adult; interorbital less than the eye in the young, greater than the eye in the adult. Deep, compressed, ventral profile evenly rounded from the tip of the lower jaw to the origin of the anal; anal basis nearly straight, very steep. Dorsal profile depressed over the eyes, humped to the dorsal; dorsal basis straight, oblique; postdorsal to caudal nearly straight, oblique. Preventral area with a median series of flat or slightly keeled scales, bordered on the sides by series of angularly bent scales; postventral area with a median series of small, narrow 1 Of these, twenty-five cf, judging by the anal armature, range from 60-90 mm., only three reach- ing the latter size; the smallest female is SO mm. long, while thirty-six of them exceed the length of the largest male. Of twelve taken at random six have thirty-six anal rays, four have thirty-seven, two have thirty-eight. 2 Of these, three have thirty-five anal rays, two have thirty-six, one has thirty-eight, and two have thirty-nine; three have eight scales between the dorsal and lateral line, four have nine; all but one have four and one half scales between the lateral line and the ventrals, one has five. The scales in the lateral line are thirty-two in two, thirty-three in two, thirty-four in two, and thirty-five in two. 3 Counting all rudimentary rays at the beginning and the double one at the end as one, out of fifty- six specimens taken at random, four have thirty-four, nine thirty-five, eighteen thirty-six, fourteen thirty- seven, seven thirty-eight, and four thirty-nine. 4 In Amazonian specimens fifteen out of eighteen had seven scales between the origin of the dorsal and the lateral line, the other three had eight. Out of twenty-four Amazonian specimens one has thirty- one, one thirty-two, twelve have thirty-three, nine thirty-four, one has thirty-five. Thirteen out of eighteen have three and one half scales between the ventrals and the lateral line, five have four. In the specimens from Puerto Murtinho there is a larger number of scales above and below the lateral line. Three out of seven have eight, the other four have nine scales between the dorsal and lateral line; six out of seven have four scales between the lateral line and the anal and one has five. The scales in the lateral line do not differ, 58 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. bent scales, bordered on the sides with small asymmetrical scales, the area com- pressed; predorsal region keeled; predorsal scales small, crowded, the median series of scales (12-16) reaching to occipital process. Occipital process long, one third of the distance from its base to the dorsal, bordered by from five to seven scales on each side, the groove of the occipital fontanel reaching to its tip; interorbital convex; second suborbital not covering the entire cheek; maxillary equal to the distance from tip of snout to pupil. From five to seven (rarely four to eight) teeth forming a continuous front series of the premaxillary, the third (in one case the fourth) usually withdrawn some- what from a straight line. Five (rarely four or six) teeth in the inner row; maxillary with three (rarely one, two, or four) small teeth. Lower jaw with four, or very rarely five, large teeth; the second largest, graduated to the fourth or fifth; many small teeth on the side. 1 Gill-rakers about 9 + 13, the longest one third the diameter of the eye. Scales deeply imbricate, an occasional line on the scales of the sides, lines more numerous on those near the caudal; scales of the sides continuous with the anal sheath consisting of three or four rows of scales in front and tapering to a single series on the last ray. Lateral line obliquely descending on the first seven scales, then nearly straight; a well-developed axillary scale; caudal lobes scaled for about half their length. Origin of dorsal about equidistant from tip of snout and base of middle caudal rays, its first divided ray two and one half times as long as the last, three times in the length. 2 Anal in the adult low, its margin nearly straight; in the young the anterior rays are higher than the rest. Origin of ventrals much nearer tip of snout than the dorsal, equidistant from 1 An examination of a variety of specimens gives the number of teeth in the: first series of pre- second series of mandible maxillary premaxillary maxillary 4 5 4 5 6 7 S 4 5 6 12 3 4 Localities males 10 1 5 4 10 7 2 Rio Puty females 7 3 7 3 10 115 3 Rio Puty 6 2 4 6 5 1 I^a 13 13 6 3 1 10 2 3 10 Santarem 6 1 3 2 4 2 2 4 In this table the first line of figures gives the different numbers of teeth found on the structures mentioned above and the following lines represent the number of individuals having the given number. 2 In the specimen from Tumatumari the first divided ray is three and one half times as high as the last ray which is two thirds the length. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 59 tip of snout and last fourth of anal. Ventrals reaching to anus or anal; pectorals beyond the origin of the ventrals. Two oblique dark bars, one from in front of the dorsal to the pectoral, the other parallel to it from behind the tip of the occipital crest; a dusky predorsal line continued on the first dorsal ray; a dark spot at end of caudal peduncle, inconspicuous in the adult, sometimes extending across the entire peduncle and base of caudal in the young. Anal sometimes margined with dusky. Dorsal membrane thickly punctate. Otherwise bright silvery. About twelve of the anterior anal rays of the male with hooklets turned toward the base of the fin, about twelve of the hooklets on the middle half of the first rays, the number decreasing backward. Air-bladder very large, each section a cone, their bases contiguous, the posterior section nearly twice as long as the anterior, bent downward and ex- tending to the origin of the anal, the diameter of its large end equaling two thirds the length of the head. Alimentary canal about one and two fifths times the length over all. Vertebrae 10 + 19 counting the coalesced as one. Tip of occipital process extending much beyond the posterior face of the skull. 2. Tetragonopterus chalceus Agassiz. Plate 4, fig. 1; Plate 98, fig. 4. Coregonus amboinensis Artedi, Species, 1738, p. 44. Tetragonopterus argenteus Artedi, Seba, Lecupl. rerum, 1758, 3, tab. 34, fig. 3, p. 174 (Rio Negro; Suri- nam). Tetragonopterus chalceus Agassiz, Spix Selecta gen. et spec. Pise. Bras., 1829, p. 70, tab. 33, fig. 1 (Brazil) ; Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. nat. poissons, 1848, 22, p. 140; Kner, Characinen, 1859, p. 38 (Rio Negro; Surinam); Gunther, Cat. fishes Brit, mus., 1864, 6, p. 320 (British Guiana, Essequibo); Cope, Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 1871, p. 260 (Ambyiacu); Steindachner, Ichthyol. beitr., 1876 6, p. 47 (Xingu, near Porto do Moz); Eigenmann & Eigenmann, Proc. N. S. N. M., 1891, 14, p. 52; Ulrey, Ann. N. Y. acad. sci., 1895, 8, p. 227; Vaillant, Bull. Mus. hist, nat., 1899, 5, p. 154 (Carsevenne) ; Pellegrin, Bull. Mus. hist, nat., 1899, 6, p. 157 (Apure); Fowler, Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 1906, p. 440 (Ambyiacu; Maraiion; Pebas); Eigenmann, Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1910, 3, p. 438; Mem. Carnegie mus., 1912, 6, p. 320, fig. 38 (Wismar; Bartica; Tumatumari; Crab Falls; Rockstone); Fowler, Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 1914, p. 242 (Rupununi). t Tetragonopterus artedii Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. nat. poissons, 1848, 22, p. 128 (Surinam); Gunther, Cat. fishes Brit, mus., 1864, 6, p. 319; Eigenmann & Eigenmann, Proc. U. S. N. M., 1891, 14, p. 52; Ulrey, Ann. N. Y. acad. sci., 1895, 8, p. 272. 1 1 The type of this species was given to the Paris museum by the Ley den museum. It measures 68 mm. to base of caudal. Lat. line 31; A. 32 (Valenciennes says 40). 60 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Tetragorwpterus schomburgkii Cuvier & Val., Hist. nat. poissons, 1848, 22, p. 137 (Essequibo) 1 . Tetrugonopterus ortonii Gill, Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 1870, p. 92 (Brazil ?) ; Cope, Proc. Amer. philos. soc, 1869, 11, p. 566 (Pebas). Habitat. — Guianas and Amazons, Rio San Francisco. Specimens examined. 2 Catalogue Number of Size in number specimens mm. Locality Collector 20747 8 . 76-118 Maues, Rio Madeira Agassiz. 20994 1 88 Serpa Thayer. 20714 1 65 Villa Bella Agassiz. 20828 1 about 68 Obidos James. 20781 8 81-92 Santarem Bourget. 21009 1 135 ? Justa. 20923 2 62-88 San Francisco below the falls Hartt. 20852 2 about 68 Jutahy James, Thayer, and Talisman. 20746 7 Porto do Moz Agassiz. 1377 C. 118521. 4 58-68 Wismar, Demerara River Eigenmann. 1378 C. 118531. 6 65-71 Bartica, Essquibo River Shideler. 1379 C. 118541. 15 47-76 Turaatumari, Potaro River Eigenmann. 1380 C. 11855 I. 18 50-91 Crab Falls, Essequibo River Eigenmann. 1381 C. 11856 1. 4S 41-49 Rockstone, Essequibo River Eigenmann. 2989 C. 2 65-80 Maciel, Rio Guapore Haseman. 2990 C. 21 largest 61 Santa Rita, San Francisco Basin Haseman. 2991 C. 13 60-76 Joazeiro, Rio San Francisco Haseman. 2992 C. 3 54-80 Penedo, Rio San Francisco Haseman. 2993 C. 3 52-63 (to base of caudal) Penedo, Rio San Francisco Haseman. 2994 C. 6 48-81 Pirapora, San Francisco Haseman. 2995 C. 5 35-75 Barreiras, Lagoas of Rio Grande, Rio San Francisco Haseman. 2996 C. 19 largest 42 Boqueirao, near mouth of Rio Preto Haseman. 2997 C. 31 71 ' Lagoa Pereira, Rio San Francisco Haseman. Head 3.2-3.66; depth l|-2; D. 11; A. usually 32 or 33. 3 Scales 7-29 to 1 The type, one specimen in bad condition, from the Essequibo, 160 mm. A. 32; scales large, about 30; depth a little less than 2; head 3.66; eye very large, about 2.33 in the head, about equal to the convex interorbital; maxillary with three small teeth; pectorals extending to ventrals; anal not falcate, dorsal behind the vertical from the ventrals, not reaching the adipose. No occipital process. The nape of the specimen seems to have met with an accident and it is difficult to determine how much of the difference between it and the types of T. rufipes is due to bad preservation and to the mutilation. The eye is much larger than in the type of T. rufipes. Caudal spot not continued on the middle rays. 2 1 have also examined the types of T. artedii and T. schomburgkii. 3 Out of twenty-one one has twenty-eight, one has thirty, four have thirty-one, eight have thirty- two, five have thirty-three, and two have thirty-four anal rays. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 61 34 '-3^. Eye 2.2-2.3; interorbital 2.2-2.66, equal to the eye or less than the eye in the adult. Deep, compressed, ventral profile evenly curved to the anal, not as greatly arched as in T. argenteus; anal basis nearly straight. Dorsal profile depressed over eye; arched to the dorsal; dorsal basis oblique, straight; postdorsal part of profile nearly straight. Preventral area with a median series of flat or slightly keeled scales, bordered on the side by a series of angularly bent scales; post- ventral area with a series of small, narrow bent scales, the area compressed; predorsal region bluntly keeled, the scales not notably small, the median series of eight or nine scales reaching the occipital process. Occipital process long, one third of the distance from its base to the dorsal, bordered by three or four scales on each side; groove of the occipital fontanel reaching to its tip; interorbital convex; second suborbital not covering the entire cheek; maxillary equal to the distance from tip of snout to pupil; five or six teeth in the front series of the premaxillary (five in thirteen cases, six in fourteen), the third tooth from the middle usually withdrawn from the line; five teeth in the inner series of the premaxillary; usually three teeth (two in five cases, three in eighteen, four in four) on the maxillary; lower jaw with four large graduated teeth and many small ones on the side. Gill-rakers about 4 + 13, the longest about one third the diameter of the eye. Scales deeply imbricate, striae lacking or an occasional line on the scales, the striae fairly numerous near the caudal; scales of the sides continuous with the anal sheath which is composed of three series of scales near its anterior end, becoming reduced to a single series on the last rays; caudal lobes densely scaled to near their tips in the adult, the scales much more readily caducous than those of the sides; lateral line obliquely descending on the first seven scales then nearly straight. A well-developed axillary scale. Origin of dorsal equidistant from tip of snout and tip of adipose or caudal, its highest ray three to four times as high as its lowest, two to three in the length; anal in the adult with its margin nearly straight; the anterior rays being but slightly prolonged; origin of ventrals equidistant from the tip of snout with the dorsal and equidistant between the tip of snout and end of anal, reaching to anus; pectorals usually falling short of the ventral, except in Guiana speci- mens. 1 Of ten specimens from Lagoa Pereira one has twenty-nine, three have thirty, four thirty-one, and two thirty-two. Of ten specimens from Roekstone one lias thirty-one, three have thirty-two, five thirty- three and one has thirty-four. 62 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. Fresh specimens from the Essequibo River have the fins more or less suf- fused with red. The first prolonged anal ray milk-white, the first fully formed dorsal ray either dark or milk-white. In these specimens there is a humeral spot prolonged above and below with a bar and a second bar fainter but evident extends down from the dorsal parallel with the first. There is a well-marked dark band-like spot at the base of the caudal. These approach T. argenteus in color. The first three developed rays of the dorsal sometimes reach the caudal, the first three anal rays are also sometimes prolonged to a length about two thirds that of the anal base. No humeral bars in old alcoholic specimens in which the caudal spot is more or less obscure with age; dorsal membranes thickly peppered; general color bright and iridescent, silvery. Air-bladder very large, the sections conical, the posterior about twice as long as the anterior, sharply pointed behind, its largest diameter, at its base, equals about half the length of the head. Alimentary canal somewhat longer than the entire fish. Vertebrae 10 + 19; occipital process extending much beyond the posterior face of the skull. 3. Tetragonopterus huberi Steindachner. Tetragonopterus huberi Steindachner, Anz. K. akad. wiss. Wien, 1909, no. 12, p. 172 (Rio Pums); Eigenmann, Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1910, 3, p. 438. Habitat. — Rio Purus, Upper Amazon Basin. This species known only from the brief description of two specimens is said to differ from T. argenteus chiefly in having its caudal completely scaled. It is evidently closely allied if not identical with T. chalceus. Head 2.7; depth 1.66; D. 11; A. 32; scales 8.5-31-4.5. Eye 2.7 in the head; interorbital 2.33. Belly with lateral keels; profile of head concave, that of nape very convex; maxillary with 3-4 teeth; height of prolonged dorsal rays 3 in the length; pec- torals little shorter than head, reaching beyond origin of ventrals; ventrals H in the head; origin of ventrals in front of the vertical from the dorsal; pre- dorsal area keeled; distance between dorsal and adipose equal to the head. A row of scales along the base of the anal; traces of two dark vertical humeral bands; caudal spot wanting in a small specimen, faint in a large one. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 63 4. Tetragonopterus gibbosus Steindachner. Tetragonoptcrus gibbosus Steindachner Siisswf. sudostl. Bras., 1876, 3, p. 4, pi. 1, fig. 1 (Rio Parahyba); Eigenmann & Eigenmann, Proc. U. S. N. M., 1891, 14, p. 52; Ulhey, Ann. N. Y. acad. sci., 1895, 8, p. 277; Eigenmann, Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1910, 3, p. 438. Habitat. — Parahyba. This species is known only from the types in the Vienna Museum. If the caudal is naked as the artist has drawn it and if as Dr. Steindachner says the "Oberkiefer, unter der Loupe gesehen, am vorderen Rande dicht mit Ziihnen besetzt " then this species does not belong to Tetragonopterus as here understood. In the characters other than the above and those mentioned in the key this species closely resembles the Tetragonopterus chalceus which geo- graphically is its closest neighbor. Head 3.6; depth 1.66-1.8; D. 10-11; A. 31-33; scales 6.5 or 7-28 or 29-3.5 to 4. Eye 2.2-2.4 in the head; interorbital 3 in the head. Much compressed, the profile little concave over eye, rising rapidly; ven- tral profile regular to the anal; depth of caudal peduncle 5 in the greatest depth; mouth oblique, terminal; 10-11 mandibular teeth, with the exception of the outer pair more than twice as long and thick as the premaxillary teeth; second suborbital nearly covering the cheek; origin of the dorsal a little in advance of the middle; pectorals reaching a little beyond origin of the ventrals, equal to the length of the head in the male, considerably shorter in the female, ventral considerably in advance of the vertical from the dorsal, not reaching anal; basis of anal scaled; its base half an orbital diameter longer than the head. Caudal only moderately forked and about as long as the head. Lateral line rapidly descending on the first six scales; scales of the middle of the sides very deep, radiae variable, 1-7; the three preventral series of scales very bluntly keeled; the lateral keels forming the edge of the belly. Scales of the nape apparently not decreasing in size. A light yellow lateral band; humeral and caudal spots very faint, the former sometimes absent. 2. Entomolepis, gen. nov. ivToitos, cut; \ewh, i}, scale. In allusion to the crenate scales. Type. — Tetragonopterus steindachneri Eigenmann. Caudal scaled; lateral line but little decurved, complete; the scales cre- nate; an enlarged scale on either side of the occipital process; maxillary with few 64 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. teeth, second suborbital leaving a narrow naked area on the cheek. This genus differs from Moenkhausia in having crenate instead of entire scales. Habitat. — Middle and Upper Amazon. 1. Entomolepis steindachneri (Eigenmann). Plate 3, fig. 1-3, Plate 6, fig. 3. Tetragonoplerus lineatus Steindachner (non Perugia), Ichthyol. beitr. 1891, 15, p. 26, pi. 2, fig. 1 (Iqui- tos). Tetragonoplerus steindachneri Eigenmann, Proc. U. S. N. M., 1893, 16, p. 53. Moenkhausia steindachneri Eigenmann, Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1910, 3, p. 437 fAslyanax oligolepis Fowler (non Gtinther), Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 1906, p. 439, fig. 37 (Peruvian Amazon). Habitat. — Middle and Upper Amazon. Aside from the types in Vienna I have examined the following, from which the present description is drawn: Two specimens, 20967, 71 and 74 mm. to base of caudal. Cudajas. Thayer & Bourget. Head 3.6; depth 2.26; D. 10 or 11; A. 25 to 26; scales 5-32 to 33-4 or 4.5. Eye 3-3.2; interorbital 2.4 in head. Deep oval, without distinct humps or depressions; pre ventral area somewhat compressed, keeled; postventral area more narrowly compressed; predorsal area with a blunt median keel; a median series of nine scales reaching from dorsal to occipital process. Occipital process about one fifth of the distance of its base from the dorsal, bordered by one or two scales, the first of which is unusually large; skull heavy and broad; frontal fontanel nearly circular, not half as long as the occipital fontanel; interorbital convex; second suborbital corrugate, leaving but a very narrow naked border; interopercle distinctly visible from the side; maxillary 3.33 in head; four teeth in the outer series of the premaxillary, the middle two close together, the third withdrawn from the line of the others; five teeth in the inner series; one or two teeth on the maxillary; mandible with four large graduated teeth. Gill-rakers 8 and 10, very slender, the longest two thirds of the pupil. Scales large, crenate, very regularly imbricate, the exposed margin of those on the caudal peduncle three fourths as high as the highest on the middle of the sides; the scale at the base of the occipital crest much larger than usual; each THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 65 scale with a few widely diverging striae and numerous shorter ones along the margin; anal sheath composed of two series of scales in front, of a single series behind; caudal lobes scaled for about half their length; lateral line not greatly descending, the rows of scales above and below it parallel with it; a well-devel- oped axillary scale. Dorsal about equidistant from snout and caudal, short and high, its height 3.66 in the length; anal margin nearly straight, but the anterior rays nearly twice as high as the posterior; pectorals reaching ventrals, the latter not to the anal, equidistant from tip of snout and base of last anal ray. Brownish above, silvery on the sides; a series of dark lines between the series of scales; a faint humeral spot just above the fourth scale of the lateral line; a large caudal blotch not extending forward or to the end of the middle rays. This species can easily be distinguished by its crenate scales, compressed breast, and peculiar coloration. It is very probable that Fowler's Astyanax oligolepis is this species. If the rows of scales are as Fowler figures then his specimens are distinct, differ- ing from all other species of the group. 3. Moenkhausia Eigenmann. For William J. Moenkhaus. Moenkhausia Eigenmann, Smithsonian misc. coll. quart., 1903, 45, p. 145. Type. — Tetragonopterus xinguensis Steindachner. Small fishes differing from Tetragonopterus in the course of the lateral line. The line is straight or but little decurved. In other characters some of the species of this genus agrees with Tetragonopterus. The species differ greatly in shape. The extreme in one direction are very compressed and very deep, the depth being more than one half the length. The extreme in the other direction are quite slender, subspindle shaped, the depth being only one fourth of the length. The preventral area may be either narrowly rounded, as in M. profunda, latissima, comma, and oligolepis, more broadly rounded as in M. chysargyrea, or flat with lateral angles as in M. jamesi, megalops, et al. There is a regular median series of scales in front of the ventrals. The anal rays range from 18-37, in number; the scales from 22-39; the lateral line is complete except as noted under M. australe, cotinho, and sanctae filomenae. In these species the 66 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. lateral line is complete in the specimens from some localities and incomplete in those from other localities, or both types may be found in the same place. The genus differs from Astyanax in having its caudal partly covered with minute scales. It merges directly into the genus Hemigrammus which has an incom- plete lateral line. Habitat. — Very abundant in Guiana and the Amazons, extending south to the Paraguay and Parana Rivers and to the Rio Doce. It has not been recorded from the Magdalena Basin from Central America, the western slope of South America, or the lower reaches of the La Plata. Key to the Species. a. Depth considerably more than half of the length; much compressed. A. 33; scales 8-34-7. 1. bondi Fowler. to. Depth 2-2.66 in the length, sometimes 3.25 in M. costae. See also aaa. A. 23-36; Occipital pro- cess one third to one fifth as long as the distance from its base to the dorsal. 6. Five or more scales between the lateral line and ventrals. c. Horizontal dark lines between the rows of scales; no caudal spot; humeral spot very long, pointed in front. Median line behind occipital process sometimes covered by the bent over margins of the scales along the side of the compressed back. Head 3.75; depth 2; A. 31- 36; scales 5| or 6-33 to 36-6; preventral area narrowly rounded; predorsal area sharply keeled; occipital process two sevenths of the length from its base to the dorsal; origin of ventrals equidistant from tip of snout and origin of last third of anal. 2. latissima Eigenmann. cc. No horizontal dark lines; seven scales between dorsal and lateral line; ventrals equidistant from tip of snout and last anal ray, or nearer the latter; a median series of scales from the dorsal to the occipital process. d. A caudal spot; a large faint vertically crescentic humeral spot; mouth minute; preventral area flat; head 4; depth 2-2.2. e. A. 33-35; scales 7-35 to 37-5; anal margin nearly straight; maxillary short, its length equals length of snout; premaxillary teeth three- or five-pointed; maxillary without teeth; five graduated teeth on each side of the lower jaw; second suborbital leaving but a narrow naked area; maxillary 4 in head; mandible 3 3. jamesi Eigenmann. ee. A. 31; scales 7-36-6; maxillary with a single tooth; premaxillary teeth four or five pointed; four graduated teeth on each side of the lower jaw; maxillary less than snout in length, 5 in head; mandible 3 in head; second suborbital but two thirds the width of the cheek 4. justae Eigenmann. dd. No caudal spot; a well-defined longitudinally ovate or round humeral spot; preventral area rounded; mouth large; fins large. /. Maxillary with many teeth; eye large, 2-2.5 in the head, the profile much depressed over the eye; interorbital less than diameter of eye; one fourth of the cheek naked; humeral spot elongate, beginning over the second scale of the lateral line; depth 2.1-2.6; head about 4; A. 34-37; scales 7 or 8-34 to 37-6 or 7; highest dorsal ray not reaching adipose 5. doceana (Steindachner). ff. Maxillary with 1 or 2 teeth, equal to the distance from tip of snout to pupil; eye 2.5 THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 67 or more in the head, equals interorbital ; profile not much depressed over eye; hum- eral spot short, nearly equidistant from opercle and dorsal; depth 2.1-2.4; A. 26-30; scales 7-33 or 35-5 or 6; highest dorsal ray usually not reaching adipose. 6. chrysargyrea (Giinther). ///. Maxillary with two teeth; maxillary longer than the distance from tip of snout to pupil; eye 2.5 or more in the head, equals interorbital; the profile scarcely depressed; hum- eral spot prolonged forward to a point; depth 2-f-; A. 26; scales 6-32-5; highest dorsal rays reaching the adipose 7. comma Eigenmann. 66. Three and a half or four scales between the lateral line and ventrals. g. Six scales between the dorsal and the lateral line. Depth 2.3; no caudal spot, no humeral spot; A. 26, lateral line 34; maxillary length equals distance from tip of snout to pupil; third tooth of the anterior premaxillary series entirely withdrawn from the line of the rest, forming a separate series; maxillary with 2 teeth; a black line along base of anal; occipital process one fifth the distance from its base to the dorsal 8. melogramma Eigenmann. gg. Five scales between the dorsal and lateral line. h. A broad black band across the anterior part of caudal. A. 23-28; preventral area narrowly rounded (See also M. cotinho). i. Scales 5-29 to 32-4 9. oligolepis (Giinther) . ii. Scales 22-26, rarely 28 10. sanclae filomenae (Steindachner). hh. Caudal without black band. j. Some striae of the scales diverging from the middle line of each scale in nearly opposite directions, up and down; eye 2.33-2.5 in the head, equal to the interorbital; origin of dorsal directly over the origin of the ventrals; no caudal spot in the adult; a round humeral spot. Anal usually 26-28, emarginate; depth usually 2 (sometimes 2.4) scales 5-24 to 32-4. 11. grandisquamis (Mttller & Troschel). jj. Striae of the scales not as under j. k. Depth 2 in the length; anal not emarginate; dorsal rounded, the anterior rays not much higher than the posterior, its origin behind that of the ventrals. Eye 3 in the head, 1.33 in interorbital; scales 5-31—4 (to ventrals); A. 27, its margin straight; head 3.66; depth 2; profile scarcely depressed; maxillary with two teeth, extending somewhat beyond the anterior margin of the eye; preventral area flat; a large caudal spot, not extending to the end of the middle rays. 1 . . . . 12. ovalis (Giinther). kk. Depth 2.2-2.6 in the length. Upper caudal lobe not black. I. Eye 2.4 or more in the head. to.. A. 30-33; scales 5.5-37-4.5; head 4.2-4.3; depth 2.4; interorbital smaller than eye; a faint vertical humeral spot; tips of caudal and middle rays faintly dusky 13. barhouri Eigenmann. toto. A. 26; scales 5-32-4; head 3.33; depth 2.33; maxillary reaching to near middle of eye; no caudal spot; humeral spot large, faint. 14. xinguensis (Steindachner). mmm. A. 23-24; scales 5-30 to 34-3; head 3.75-^; depth 2.3-2.6. Scales with dark margins; a well-developed humeral spot. 15. browni Eigenmann. II. Eye 2-2.2 in head; interorbital 2.4-3; scales 5-35^; head 3.6-3.7; depth 2.5-2.66; 1 Based on type in the British museum. 68 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. n. No caudal spot; a vertical humeral spot. A. 28-30. 16. megalops Eigenmann. nn. A median caudal spot; no humeral spot. A. 26. 17. shideleri Eigenmann. kkk. Upper caudal lobe with an oblique black band, continued downward across the caudal peduncle and along the basal portion of the anal. A. 27-28, scales 5.5-32 or 33-3.5; head 3.4-3.75; depth 2.25-3.25. Longitudinal extent of premaxillary insignificant. 18. costae (Steindachner). aaa Depth usually more than 2.75 in the length (2.6 in M. dichroura, M. lata, and gravid M. colletli), anal less than 28 in all but exceptional specimens of M . dichroura and M. lata, o. Base of caudal without definite spot or band. p. Premaxillary very short; maxillary with its anterior margin very convex. Caudal lobes black at the tips, or with a black band across them, their tips white; base of caudal pale; depth usually 3(2.75); A. 25-27 rarely 28; lat. line 36 or 37 (rarely 34, 35, or 39); gill-rakers one third to one half the length of the eye 19. dichroura (Kner). pp. Anterior margin of maxillary not sharply and evenly curved premaxillary longer than under p, the mouth strong. q. Tips of caudal lobes black or a black band across the lobes. r. A. 25; scales 5-35-3.5; depth 3.1-3.75. 20. intermedia Eigenmann. qq. Lobes of caudal without well-defined cross-band, s. Base of anal without a black line. t. Base of upper caudal lobe yellow or orange, this fol- lowed by black which fades toward the tip with water markings. u. Depth 3-3.5; A. 24 (21-27). 21. lepidura lepidura (Kner) . uu. Depth 2.6; A. 26 (25-28); lateral line 33 or 34, middle caudal rays faintly colored. 22. lepidura lata Eigenmann. It. Upper caudal lobe not black. v. Depth 3; A. 23 or 24; lateral line 31-33; pectorals not reaching ventrals; upper caudal lobe and sometimes the distal part of the other rays dusky 23. lepidura icae Eigenmann. w. Depth 3.4; A. 24; lateral line 37; pectorals not reaching ventrals; caudal lobes plain. 24. lepidura hasemani Eigenmann. vw. JDepth 4; A. 21-23; lateral line 35-36; pectorals to ventrals; usually the middle caudal rays and distal part of all the other rays dusky. 25. lepidura gracilirna Eigenmann. ss. Anal with a dark (zigzag) line along its base; silvery lateral line very narrow, bordered with dark above, no caudal spot; upper part of cheek and opercle with numerous chromatophores. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 69 w. Anal rays 23-24; depth 2.6-3.3; lateral line 33-35; a well-defined humeral spot. 26. collelii (Steindachner). ww. Anal rays 18-20; depth 3.33-3.66; lateral line 32-34 27. copei (Steindachner). oo. A large, conspicuous black spot on the base of the caudal; origin of ventrals equidistant from tip of snout and base of caudal. x. Second suborbital leaving a wide naked area; five or six teeth in the inner series of the premaxillary; gill-rakers about 9 and 15, one half as long as eye; 2.5 scales between lateral line and front of anal; middle caudal rays jet black, the color spreading over the base of the fin. Depth 3.25; A. 19; eye greater than interorbital. 28. ceroa Eigenmann. xx. Second suborbital leaving a very narrow naked area; five teeth in the inner series of the premaxillary; gill-rakers 7 and 9, one fifth as long as eye; 2.5-3.5 scales between lateral line and front of anal; a very large and conspicuous vertically oval spot occupy- ing nearly all the base of the caudal to near the tip of the middle rays, bordered by milk- white; depth 3 + ; A. 20 or 21; eye about equal or less than interorbital. 29. cotinho Eigenmann. 1. Moenkhausia bondi (Fowler). Plate 14, fig. 3; Plate 100, fig. 7. Phenacogastcr bondi Fowler, Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phil., 1911, p. 419 (Corisal, Venezuela). Moenkhausia profunda Eigenmann, Mem. Carnegie mus., 1912, 5, p. 322, pi. 46, fig. 1 (Issorora Rubber Plantation). Habitat. — Northern Guiana and Venezuela. I have been able to examine the type of M. bondi in the collections of the Academy of Natural Science in Philadelphia and 2207 C. Type of M. pro- funda, 51 mm. Issorora Rubber Plantation. Shideler. Head 4; depth 1.66-1.8; D. 11; A. 33; scales 8-34-7 (9 to the anal). Eye 2.6; interorbital 2.5. Very much compressed; the ventral profile nearly a regular section of a circle; dorsal profile not so greatly and less regularly arched; preventral area very narrowly rounded, without a median series of scales, the lateral scales small and their margins bent over the median ridge; predorsal area narrow, 70 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. scaled, but without a distinct median series, the scales along the ridge much smaller than those of the sides. Occipital process reaching one third of the distance to the dorsal, bordered by about five scales on each side; interorbital slightly convex; mouth small; maxillary with the anterior margin convex, equal to snout and anterior width of iris or snout and half the eye. Second suborbital leaving a considerable naked area; maxillary with two teeth, premaxillary with four teeth in the outer series, five in the inner; mandible with four strong teeth, five-pointed, abruptly minute teeth on the sides. Gill-rakers about a third as long as the eye. Scales thin, with a few feeble diverging striae, margins convex; anal with a sheath of two rows of scales; lateral line almost straight; no interpolated rows of scales. Origin of dorsal considerably behind the ventrals, three in the length; anal long, but little emarginate, its origin and base of last dorsal ray equidistant from the snout; pectorals reaching about to middle of ventrals; ventrals not to anal. A diffuse humeral band followed after a light band by a fainter dark band. This species is technically a Moenkhausia. In reality its relationship is with Ephippicharax of another subfamily. It differs from Ephippicharax in not having a movable predorsal spine. 2. Moenkhausia latissima Eigenmann. Plate 6, fig. 2. Moenkhausia latissimus Eigenmann, Bull. M. C. Z., 190S, 62, p. 101 (Tabatinga); Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1910, 3, p. 437. Habitat. — Tabatinga. Specimens examined. Number of Catalogue number specimens Size in mm. Locality Collector 207G2 22 about 55-92 Tabatinga Bourget •iU/oy J This species, resembling Entomolepis steindachneri in its coloration, com- pressed preventral region, and keeled predorsal area, is easily distinguished by its entire scales, small nuchal scale, and much longer anal fin. THE AMERICAN TETRAGONOPTERINAE. 71 Head 3.75; depth 2 on an average; D. 11; A 33-35; ' scales 5.5 or 6-33- 36-6. 2 Eye 2.75-4; interorbital 2.5. Very deep, compressed, profile slightly depressed over eye, ventral and dorsal profiles about equally arched; preventral area narrowly rounded or keeled; postventral area compressed; predorsal area sharply compressed and keeled, with a few notched median scales, further forward the scales of the sides are bent over the sharply compressed area; postdorsal area narrowly rounded. Occipital process narrow and long, two sevenths in the length to the dorsal, bordered by four scales; interorbital broad, rounded; fontanels narrow, the anterior less than half as long as the posterior which is continued as a groove to the tip of the occipital process; second suborbital large, striate, leaving a narrow naked area between it and the lower limb of the preopercle; maxillary three in head, mandible 2.33. Usually four, rarely three or five teeth in the outer series of the premaxillary, the second and third close together, the third removed from the line of the others, five teeth in the inner series; two, rarely three, in one case one and in one four teeth in the maxillary; lower jaw with four graduated teeth and numerous minute ones. Gill-rakers 8 + 11, the longest two thirds as long as the pupil. Scales regularly imbricate, the exposed margin of those on the caudal peduncle but little lower than that of those on middle of the sides, the width of the exposed part a little more than half of the height; a few divergent striae, the margins not crenate; nuchal scales not enlarged; anal sheath composed of two series of scales in front, of a single one behind; lateral line but little decurved, caudal lobes scaled for at least half their length. Dorsal about equidistant from tip of snout and base of caudal; its height three and a half in the length, its tip when laid back removed by five scales from the adipose. Lower caudal lobe somewhat the longer, three and a fourth in the length; anal emarginate, origin of anal and last dorsal ray equidistant from tip of snout ; origin of ventrals below the third scale in front of the dorsal, equidistant from tip of snout and origin of last third of anal, reaching to or nearly to the anal; pectorals reaching the tip of the axillary scale. No caudal spot; a well-defined, narrow, but very long, humeral spot reaching from above the third to above the ninth scale of the lateral fine, on the upper part of the series of scales above the lateral fine and the lower part of the series 1 Of seventeen one has thirty-one, six have thirty-three, five have thirty-four, four have thirty-five and one has thirty-six. 2 Qf sixteen two have thirty-three, two thirty-four, seven thirty-five, five thirty-six. 72 THE AMERICAN CHARACIDAE. next above that. The spot is rounded behind, pointed in front, and bordered by a lighter area; horizontal dark lines between successive series of scales. Vertebrae 11 +19. Posterior air-bladder bent conical, its diameter greater than that of the eye, two and a half in its length; anterior air-bladder one and a half in the length of the posterior. Alimentary canal about equal to the length; containing insects and small fishes. 3. Moenkhausia jamesi Eigenmann. Plate 6, fig. 1, Plate 100, fig. 8. Moenkhausia jamesii Eigenmann, Bull. M. C. Z., 1908, 52, p. 102 (I<;a; Obidos; Lago do Maximo; Taja- puru); Eigenmann, Rept. Princeton univ. exped. Patagonia, 1910, 3, p. 437. Habitat. — Amazon Basin. Specimens examined. Catalogue Number of Size number specimens in mm. Locality Collector 20816 Cotypes 2 62,68 I~te^ »^Y i >^frw riti^^^^ 8 HELIOTVPE CO., BOSTON PLATE 98. PLATE 98. Fig. 1. Creatochanes melanurus (Bloch). 11887 I. U. M. 136 inni. Wismar, British Guiana. Fig. 2. Genycharax tarpon Eigenmann. 12674 1. U. M. 135 mm. Cali, Colombia. Fig. 3. Stichanodon insignis (Steindachner). 20803 M. C. Z. 65 mm. Manacapuru, Brazil. Fig. 4. Tetragonopterus chaloeus Agassiz. 118551. U. M. 85 mm. Crabs Falls, British Guiana. Fig. 5. Ephippicharax orbicularis (Cuvier & Valenciennes). 12212 I. U. M. 82 mm. Rockstone, British Guiana. Fig. 6. Stethaprion erythrops Cope. 19268 M. C. Z. 94 mm. Jutahy, Brazil. Fig. 7. Ctenobrycon hauxwellianus (Cope). 20814 M. C. Z. 84 mm. Ica, Brazil. MEM. MUS. COMP. ZOOL. CHARAC1DAE PLATE 98 HEUOTYPE CO., BOSTON PLATE 100. PLATE 100. Camera outlines of the heads. Fig. 1. Moenkhausia barbouri Eigenmann. Fig. 2. Moenkhausia costae (Steindachner). Fig. 3. Moenkhausia diehroura (Kner). Fig. 4. Moenkhausia melogramma Eigenmann. Fig. 5. Moenkhausia oligolepis (Gunther). Fig. 6. Moenkhausia grandisquamis (Muller and Troschel). Fig. 7. Moenkhausia bondi Fowler. Fig. 8. Moenkhausia jamesi Eigenmann. Fig. 9, 10. Moenkhausia chrysargyrea (Gunther). MEM. MUS. COMP. ZOOL. CHARACIDAE PLATE 100 HEUCnPE CO., BOSTON PLATE 101. PLATE 101. Camera outlines of the heads. Fig. 1. Moenkhausia ceros Eigenmann. Type. Fig. 2. Moenkhausia cotinho Eigenmann. Type. Fig. 3. Moenkhausia collettii (Steindachner). Fig. 4. Moenkhausia copei (Steindachner). Fig. 5. Moenkhausia lepidura hasemani Eigenmann. Fig. 6. Moenkhausia lepidura icae Eigenmann. Fig. 7. Moenkhausia lepidura gracilima Eigenmann. Figs. 8, 9. Moenkhausia intermedia Eigenmann. Fig. 10. Moenkhausia lepidura lata Eigenmann. MEM. MUS. COMP. ZOOL. CHARACIDAE PLATE 101 10 HEUOTYPE CO., BOSTON PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY AT HARVARD COLLEGE. There have been published of the Bulletin Vols. I. to LIV., and Vols. LVI., LVIII. to LX.; of the Memoirs, Vols. I. to XXXIV., and also Vols. XXXVI. to XXXVIII., XL. to XLII., XLIV., and XLVI. Vols. LV., LVII., LXL, and LXII. of the Bulletin, and Vols. XXXV., XXXIX., XLIII., XLV., XLVII. toXLTX. of the Memoirs, are now in course of publication. .1 price lint of the publication* of the Museum will In sent on appli- cation to the Director of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mass. 7 ' W ' /> > >/ ) ■> J »>> * Oy» > >)> J> /#> > )_ > )) ) ,h B. N . "• k ^ I ;^> ) /l > r> » »>J »> J 1> si "J*)* ' 1 i>-^»> ^j> > j> •> »J>-K'i J >?SJ*J» J 1)